- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
UHi everyone, I am looking for advice on a long-standing case with EPFO Office, Delhi. My father passed away in July 2019, and while benefits such as the Pension and Provident Fund amount were settled as late as 2022,But the **EMPLOYEE’S DEPOSIT LINKED INSURANCE (EDLI)** portion was not sanctioned and is now stuck in a loop.
I would like to explain the matter in detail and i know it is too lengthy but i will request to please read it as it will give understanding of overall position tell on whether the case appears legally and administratively recoverable.
**CASE BACKGROUND: -**
My late father “LETS SAY-A” was employed as a Security Guard with a Security Establishment (a private security company) and was covered under EPF, EPS and EDLI schemes during his employment.
He unfortunately passed away on 10/07/2019 (Date of Death) after prolonged illness and hospitalization related to severe Health issues.
After his death:
1. PF-related death claim was processed in 2020.
2. Widow pension and children pension under EPS were sanctioned as late as 2022.
3. However, the EDLI insurance claim became disputed and remains unresolved to date.
**CORE DISPUTE: -**
The primary dispute relates to EPFO records **showing a Date of Exit (DOE) as 18/01/2019**, Based on this entry, the EPFO insurance side later treated the matter as: “Death Away From Service” and accordingly did not process the EDLI insurance benefit. However, multiple records and circumstances appear inconsistent with this conclusion as the exit date of exit marked 18 January ,2019 is completely wrong as my father Actively worked until January 25, 2019, as his last day and was admitted to the hospital on the night of January 26, 2019, due to an emergency and how records in PPO and Member Leger reflects 118 NCP days, which appears to approximately correspond with the period between the recorded DOE (18-01-2019) and Date of Death (10-07-2019).
**INITIAL EDLI CLAIM PROCESS: -**
After submission of EDLI claim documents, EPFO repeatedly returned/rejected the claim with remarks such as: “CALL FOR EO REPORT FOR CONFIRMATION OF ON ROLL DEATH” from 2020 to 2022 (we have rejection letters) and In remarks “Certificate enclosed is improper”. From these communications, it appears that EPFO itself considered the matter doubtful and sought Enforcement Officer (EO) verification regarding whether death occurred while still on the establishment rolls/service.
*However:
1. No final EO report was ever supplied to us.
2. No clear speaking order reconciling contradictory records was issued.
The matter has remained unresolved from 2019.
**PENSION RECORDS AND CONTRADICTIONS: -**
Despite the EDLI issue, EPFO later sanctioned “Widow pension” for my mother and “Children pension” for us in late 2022.
· The PPO issued to us contains the following details:
· Reason of Exit: “Death Away From Service”
· Date of Joining: 1-10-2012
· Date of Exit: 18-01-2019
· Date of Death: 10-07-2019
· Date of Commencement: 11-07-2019
· Actual Service: 5 years 11 months 25 days
· Pensionable Service: 5 years 11 months 23 days
· NCP Days: 118
· Widow Pension sanctioned
· children pensions sanctioned
**The 118 NCP (Non-Contributory Period) days appear to correspond approximately with the period between 18/01/2019 and the date of death on 10/07/2019.**
This appears contradictory because NCP days generally indicate continuation on service rolls without contribution (such as medical leave/unpaid leave), while the insurance wing simultaneously treated the member as already exited from service.
**ESIC TREATMENT AND BENEFITS: -**
My father remained under continuous treatment from **January 26, 2019** **until his death on July 10, 2019.** During this period:
· All Treatment continued under active ESIC coverage.
This also appears inconsistent with the position that he had exited the company on 18 January, 2019 (Marked Date of Exit), as all his medical treatment was done from ESIC card.
**STOPAGE (DECEMBER/2022): -**My mother ,a widow and an illiterate, was fully mentally and physically exhausted from running to this office to that office from 2019 till late 2022 (DECEMBER), When Widow and Children Pension was sanctioned after that my mother stopped pursing this matter as she felt it is impossible and she cannot run around here and there and as she was the sole earner in our family she felt if she pursues this further then she cannot be able to work properly and she has to work to survive our family. (at the time of this I was a minor and could not help my mother much)
**START (APRIL-2026): -**
**At that time, I was a minor and was in school and was unable to assist my mother in all this. Now that I am a Adult, I have taken over this case. Our family has had to take significant loans to construct our home—loans that would have been unnecessary had this insurance benefit (which is our legal right) been settled on time. We had completely forgotten about this insurance which my mother recently mentioned to me due to which I tried to solve and correct these record discrepancies because they do not change the fact that my father died “In-Service.”****WHAT ALL I HAVE DONE: -**
**GRIEVANCE HISTORY (CPGRAMS):-**
Because the matter remained unresolved for years, I filed a formal grievance through the CPGRAMS Portal. The grievance highlighted:
· Wrong Date of Exit
· PPO/NCP inconsistency
· Employer correction letter
· Continued ESIC treatment
· Pending EO verification
**In response, EPFO mainly relied upon the 18 January,2019 (Date of Exit) and maintained that EDLI was not admissible because death was treated as away from service and if discrepancy in service records employer has to correct and authenticate data in EPFO records.**
**However, the reply did not clearly explain:**
· status of EO verification
· reconciliation with pension/NCP records
**CPGRAMS APPEAL: -**
An appeal was subsequently filed against the grievance disposal. The appeal specifically argued that:
· Pension wing had already sanctioned widow pension
· PPO reflected 118 NCP days till death
· Employer admitted DOE error(previously they had marked wrong exit date, changed it with current one which is also wrong )
· EPFO itself called for EO verification for “on roll death”
· No proper reconciliation between pension and insurance records had been made
**The appeal replied came as ” With reference to your grievance, it is informed that the EDLI claim can be processed only after verification of member details and eligibility as per EPFO provisions. In this regard, any discrepancy in service records, including date of exit and contribution details, is required to be duly corrected and authenticated by the employer in EPFO records. The claim will be considered subject to reconciliation of such records and verification of eligibility conditions under the EDLI Scheme. Upon receipt of corrected and verified data from the employer, further necessary action for settlement of the EDLI claim will be taken as per rules. No action is lying pending at the level of this office, hence, appeal may be treated as disposed off”.**
**RTI APPLICATION: -**
An RTI application was later filed with RO-South Delhi seeking:
· Copy of EO report/service used to verify on roll death
· File noting regarding DOE entry
· Internal correspondence
· Action taken on employer correction letters
· Rules/circulars relied upon for EDLI rejection
· Officer-wise movement/action details
However, instead of supplying the requested records, before the last day of 30 day timeline. it was disposed as mentioned in reply pdf “In this connection, It is intimated that, the said claims have been settled by Regional Office, Delhi-Central. Accordingly, the applicant is advise to contact Regional Office, Delhi-Central for desired complete information.”, an internal email communication was also forwarded from RO-South Delhi to RO-Central Delhi by carbon copying me stating that:
· Form 10D and Form 20 had been passed
· EDLI claim carried the remark:
· “CALL FOR EO REPORT FOR CONFIRMATION OF ON ROLL DEATH”
Kindly take necessary action accordingly.**But the actual EO report and detailed records requested under RTI were not supplied.**
**HIGHER REPRESENTATIONS MADE TO DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC GRIEVANCES(DPG): -**
Further representations/grievances were also made before higher authorities (DPG) as remained unsatisfied with CPGRAMS resolution regarding:
· contradictory EPFO records
· unresolved EO verification
· lack of proper adjudication
· non-consideration of employer correction letter
· inconsistency between pension processing and insurance rejection
**The DPG replied ” With reference to grievance it is informed that claim form 5IF (Insurance) has been rejected due to member death was away from service. Therefore, member is not eligible for the same. Hence, grievance may be treated as disposed off.”**
**EPFIGMS: -**
Filed grievance in EPFIGMS stating – ”I requested access to verify records related to the pending EDLI matter of A. I needed to check claim/service history because records show DOE as 18-01-2019 and DOD as 10-07-2019, however Pension Payment Order(PPO) reflects 118 NCP days. I wanted to understand how 118 NCP days were recorded if the member had already exited service on 18-01-2019 as the period between the recorded DOE and DOD appears to match NCP days”**Got reply that – “Kindly consult with employer regarding the same matter”**
**VISIT TO EMPLOYER (MAY/2026): -**
I personally contacted and met the employer regarding the correction of the Date of Exit (DOE) from 18-01-2019 to 10-07-2019 (Date of Death) as my father remained in the company until his death while on medical leave for getting treatment and how he was admitted to the hospital in an emergency on 26-01-2019 itself and how he can exit company 1 week before on 18-01-2019 (Marked Date of Exit) and However, the employer has stated that my father actively worked only till January 2019 (have company letter regarding this) and due to which they paid his due till January and after then i showed him the EPFO Passbook where last contribution made is of Feburary,2019 where the employer further stated that the February contribution reflected in records was not for February work, but was a delayed deposit relating to January wages and that they had no information regarding his whereabouts till his death and only came to know the death when asked verbally around, where i also told them how my mother visited the company on the next day itself and verbally told about hospitalization and other things, **They have expressed reluctance to support correction of DOE up to the Date of Death(DOD) saying if they do anything now EPFO will held them accountable.**
**Furthermore, they also said the company has closed down 1 year ago and now They cannot sign or stamp anything.**
However, despite their position, certain issues still remain unclear to me. The PPO and Member Leger reflects 118 NCP days, which appears to approximately correspond with the period between the recorded DOE (18-01-2019) and Date of Death (10-07-2019), when asked Employer about the NCP Days, They said do not know anything about that and it might have been filled by EPFO/Hospital and they cannot do anything. Now, I am unable to understand on what basis these NCP days were recorded if the member had already exited service as the record shows.
**EPFO OFFICE VISIT (MAY/2026): -**
I waited for my no. and then in counter I explained my issue of EDLI presented the official employer letter acknowledging a clerical mistake in entering the January 2019 exit date and further pointed out the factual timeline: the member was admitted to the hospital in an emergency due to kidney failure on January 26, 2019, making a January 18 exit impossible as there is record of 118 NCP Days, The Counter officer sent me to PRO’s and **PRO then reviewing the printed member ledger of my father alongside the profile dates, the PRO officer said if date of exit is wrong get it corrected from employer as reason of exit shows “Death Away from service” on which I said they are not correcting it that’s why I am here, futher telling me if that’s the case then it is “illegal”.**
Despite acknowledging the data irregularity, the PRO and field staff flatly refused to take administrative ownership, verbally ordering me to *”go to the employer”.*
When I formally requested a written notice/letter or a deficiency memo from the PRO to present to the employer to demand the change, the PRO officer explicitly refused to issue any documentation, stating: *”Why will I write, I will not write, I don’t know anything, you will not get insurance and all “.* The PRO and his assistant sitting adjacent to him then explicitly closed the interaction by telling me if employer do not correct records to “go to court.”
**REQUEST FOR OPINION/LEGAL ADVICE: -**
Based on the above facts and information chronology, I would request advice on this:
1. **Does this matter appear legally maintainable and realistically recoverable?**
2. **Have you seen similar EDLI disputes involving wrong Date of Exit, “death away from service”, backend data mismatch, pension/insurance contradictions, employer correction issues, unresolved EO verification?**
3. **In your opinion, do the following materially strengthen the case: PPO with 118 NCP days, employer admission of clerical error of marking wrong date of exit(previously they had marked another wrong exit date), continued ESIC treatment/benefits till death, EO verification remarks, sanction of widow and children pension in late 2022?**
4. **What would likely be the most appropriate remedy route – “administrative rectification”, “legal notice”, EPFO representation, Employer-supported correction process?**
5. **In your experience, can such older EDLI disputes still be successfully corrected where documentary contradictions are significant?**TL;DR: EPFO denied EDLI because records show a Date of Exit (DOE) of 18-01-2019 and classify the case as “Death Away From Service.” However, PPO records show 118 NCP days until death, employer later admitted a DOE error, ESIC treatment continued until death, and EPFO itself earlier sought EO verification for “Confirmation on roll death.” I want advice on whether this appears legally recoverable and what remedy route would be appropriate.
-
