- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
UAbout 20 days ago, me and one of my friends got into a heated argument. During the argument, he physically assaulted me and broke my index finger badly enough that I needed surgery and now have a permanent implant in my finger.
Because of this injury:
I missed an important exam and now have to appear again after 6 months.
I’m in my final semester, so this may affect placements, career opportunities, finances, and mental health.
Recovery is slow and stressful, especially since it’s my hand and finger function matters a lot.
At first, after the incident, he acted supportive and kept asking if I needed help. Because we were friends, I did not immediately file an official complaint. I thought maybe things would calm down.
But over the last few weeks, I started noticing behavior that felt fake and manipulative:
He has been spreading narratives to other people that he is “helping me a lot.”
He is telling people that I am treating him badly or targeting him.
He is trying to gain sympathy from mutual friends while ignoring the actual damage caused.
Privately, he has mostly become normal/casual about the whole thing, as if nothing serious happened.
Now I am considering filing a complaint with my college/anti-ragging committee for physical assault.
My question is:
Will it look suspicious or weak that I am filing the complaint 20 days after the incident instead of immediately? Is it reasonable that I delayed because we were friends and I initially hoped things could be handled peacefully?
I would appreciate honest opinions, especially from people who have dealt with college complaints, anti-ragging cases, or assault situations. -
-
UA 20-day delay with a clear reason behind it does not kill your case, and this applies both to the college complaint and to any police complaint you choose to file.
Courts regularly deal with delayed FIRs in assault matters. The consistent principle from Supreme Court and High Court decisions is that delay needs to be explained, not that it automatically discredits you. In *Md. Inayatullah v. State of Bihar* (2023, Patna High Court), the court found a delay in filing was entirely justified because the injured party was being treated at hospital and information was still being gathered. The court relied on the principle that delay which has a credible explanation does not weaken the prosecution’s case. [1] Your explanation is exactly this kind of credible one: you were recovering from surgery, he was acting supportive, you hoped it could be handled between friends, and you only decided to act formally when his behavior became manipulative.
For the college anti-ragging committee specifically, UGC regulations on anti-ragging do not impose a fixed limitation period for filing. The committee is supposed to look at whether an incident occurred and caused harm, and a broken index finger requiring surgery and a permanent implant is not ambiguous evidence. The exam you missed and the 6-month delay to your final semester placements are quantifiable consequences the committee can factor in.
One thing to document carefully: the pattern of him spreading narratives about “helping” you while privately acting casual is relevant. If you have WhatsApp messages, witness accounts from mutual friends who heard his story, or anything showing he was aware of the seriousness, that helps counter any claim that nothing significant happened.
File with the college first, in writing, with your medical records, the surgery details, and the exam impact in the same complaint.
—
[1] [Md. Inayatullah @ Sonu v. State of Bihar (2023, Patna High Court)](https://cassie.in/research/judgment/638762) — Delay in FIR registration held justified where injured party was receiving treatment and facts were being gathered; delay did not weaken the prosecution case
-
