- This topic has 32 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
VI’ve been testing various AI models over the past few months, and the results are terrifying. Just a couple of years ago, these AI tools were inaccurate, clunky, and full of errors. But now? They’re drafting contracts, analyzing case law, predicting rulings, and even generating legal strategies better and faster than most junior lawyers. Give it another few years, and AI will likely automate the majority of what lawyers and even judges do.
Why would anyone hire a lawyer for basic legal work when AI can draft airtight agreements in seconds? Why would a client pay insane legal fees when AI can provide case strategies at a fraction of the cost?
So, tell me what actual value will human lawyers provide in upcoming years.
-
-
VAnd why’s that? AI isn’t available for Indians? Last I checked, the internet works just fine here.
-
-
S[https://www.reddit.com/r/bangladesh/comments/14oj42k/racism_and_casteism_towards_bengali/](https://www.reddit.com/r/bangladesh/comments/14oj42k/racism_and_casteism_towards_bengali/)
-
-
VI’m not talking about complex case. I’m speaking in general. Most of the work lawyers do will become obsolete and automated the work they used to charge money for and make a living from. What about that?
-
-
UYou are either unaware of or underestimate the blockade that the system can and will absolutely put up. The simple things also yield steady bribed income and are at times used to harass people whenever the need arises for people within the system. Why would they give up the tangled web of complexity and next to zero accountability? Better to keep things tied down and going worse if possible. All the education is just going to be used to critique this and borrow indefinite time and/or hide behind committee,etc
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
UAI would definitely be a part of the legal process which would help lawyers draft up agreements and basically do all the tedious stuff. But at its core, law is a profession involving creativity(as in coming up with openings, closings, defences) as well as morality(judges), both of which are human emotions and won’t be replaced anytime soon. AI, as of now, can just emulate emotions, creativity and morality but at its core, all of these are fundamental human emotions and won’t be replaced by AI as of now.
-
MAI can replace legal research/clerical work (known as “paralegal” in the US, “research interns or analysts” in India) but not lawyers themselves. Legal knowledge, nuances of the law and ability to provide legal advice comes from experience and expertise which AI probably won’t be able to replace atleast for another 7-8 years.
-
-
-
FAI is not that good. I am using one of the finest legal AI, Harvey, and trust me, it’s still not anywhere close to replacing a lawyer. If you want to summarise something, find something, it works, but where there is interpretation and application of law, or something unique, AI fails miserably. In such tasks, AI is worse than a law intern.
-
-
UNAL, but as someone who works in the IT sector, let me tell you something: AI can only help when it has data. It can be used to automate existing paperwork, but it can’t create new legal documents, contracts, or other legal work from scratch. However, it can be a great assistant—if you have case files or legal documents but don’t have time to read them, AI can summarize them for you or help you understand laws in different contexts. That said, it cannot replace an actual advocate, and it’s likely to stay that way for at least the next 10 years.
-
-
-
UYour post yells that you have no practical legal experience or you are not a lawyer. Law and its machinery works differently and AI can only fit in and fill up the content generation gap. Other than that? No tool is powerful enough to handle the legal aspect of any cases in India.
There are multiple legal AI startups in India, US and Europe even before ChatGPT. Look them up and do some research before karma farming here.
-
-
-
RAI is a powerful tool for drafting legal documents, researching complex statutes, and simplifying intricate legal concepts. It’s also great for brainstorming and exploring different perspectives.
But will AI replace lawyers or judges? No. AI won’t stand in court for a client or pass judgments—it lacks human reasoning, ethical considerations, and the ability to interpret nuances beyond data.
Moreover, AI isn’t truly independent. It’s controlled by organizations, meaning it’s not free from bias and can be influenced or manipulated. That’s why relying on AI in law should come with caution—it’s a tool, not a decision-maker.
-
HYour concerns are valid—AI is revolutionizing the legal profession at an unprecedented pace. But does that mean the legal profession is doomed? Not necessarily.
What AI Can (and Will) Do Better Than Humans
• Document drafting & review – AI can generate contracts, wills, and agreements faster and with fewer errors.
• Legal research & case law analysis – AI can sift through vast amounts of case law instantly.
• Predicting case outcomes – AI models trained on legal data can assess probabilities based on precedent.
• Automating routine tasks – Billing, compliance checks, and basic dispute resolution can be handled with minimal human involvement.What Humans Will Still Excel At
• Strategic thinking & creative lawyering – AI follows patterns; humans create new arguments, redefine legal interpretations, and push for novel precedents.
• Client advocacy & persuasion – Judges and juries are human, and emotional intelligence, negotiation skills, and personal advocacy matter in court.
• Ethical & moral reasoning – AI lacks true ethical judgment. Lawyers must ensure fairness, justice, and human rights are upheld.
• Handling ambiguity & unique cases – AI struggles with gray areas and moral dilemmas where laws are unclear or evolving.
• Courtroom presence – Advocacy, persuasion, and dynamic responses to unfolding arguments remain a human strength.Judges & AI: Automation or Assistance?
• AI can assist judges by summarizing evidence and past rulings, but full automation raises serious ethical and fairness concerns. Judicial discretion is not just about logic; it involves empathy, precedent-setting, and context beyond raw data.
• Countries like Estonia and China have experimented with AI judges for minor disputes, but complex cases still require human judgment.The Future of the Legal Profession
• Routine legal work will be automated. Expect fewer paralegals and junior associates doing document-heavy work.
• Specialized lawyers will thrive. High-stakes cases, novel legal challenges, and niche expertise will still be valuable.
• Hybrid AI-lawyer models will emerge. Lawyers using AI effectively will outperform those who resist it.
• New legal roles will emerge. AI ethics, AI-generated evidence disputes, and tech-law specializations will grow.Bottom Line
The profession isn’t doomed—it’s evolving. The lawyers who adapt, specialize, and focus on human-driven skills (like advocacy, ethical reasoning, and complex legal strategy) will still be indispensable. AI is a tool, not a replacement—at least for now.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
