- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
USo, i live in a flat that belonged to my father’s parents (both now deceased) and my father has a brother and 3 sisters. It was initially agreed upon that my father would receive a share of 60% and my uncle gets 40% for which a agreement was created by a lawyer and signed by my father’s sisters and their husbands as witnesses and this was before we received possession of the redevelopment flat.
After receiving the possession, my father’s brother and the 3 sisters decided that they would no longer be willing to adhere to the terms of the agreement and started fighting over the share of the flat. At the time we received the possession, my father’s mother was still alive and his siblings basically just took her away and got her to live with them. We had no other choice but to take this matter up in court. The case is still ongoing and they have inturn filed a false case against us stating that we used to harass my father’s mother and used to lock her up and starve her.
Would appreciate help to understand whether there is a possible way out of this and to get them to agree to the terms of the initial agreement.PS. They got my father’s mother to sign off on a will which states that we receive 0% of the share because we used to harass her.
-
-
-
UOk, this is not my advice but I overheard this sitting in a criminal lawyer’s office.
The case was related to a property dispute but Party A went to Party B place of residence with metal weapons (which they discarded before entering), Party B brought their own weapons and hit Party A members (which included elderly folks) Party A members were careful not to hit anyone. Using CCTV footage Party A filed an attempt-to-murder FIR against Party B members. Attempt-to-murder is a non-bailable offense.
Basically, now Party A is holding this criminal case over Party B members to force them to settle the dispute.
Again, this is not my advice but an account of someone mired in shitty property dispute in a corrupt country where cases are decided on who paid the judge more.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
