- This topic has 16 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 4 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
-
SIt looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.indiatoday.in/law/supreme-court/story/supreme-court-ex-google-employees-plea-religious-discrimination-2603751-2024-09-20](https://www.indiatoday.in/law/supreme-court/story/supreme-court-ex-google-employees-plea-religious-discrimination-2603751-2024-09-20)**
*****
^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
-
-
-
UOn September 20, 2024, India Today, Live Law, and @lawchakra published a misleading and factually incorrect article in a surreptitious manner regarding a petition submitted by me in the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, titled Zahid Showkat alias Mir v/s Joint Secretary PMO India Ministry of Minority AffairsGoogle & others. This article was published in a manner that concealed its existence from the public eye. Furthermore, India Today, Live Law, and Lawchakra have acted in collusion with Google to prevent the matter from entering the public domain, not only by providing misleading and factually incorrect information but also by corrupting the digital reach of an average article of a media giant like Aaj TakIndia Today Tech. The news was not only published surreptitiously but also presented in a way that covertly covered the violations of law by the respondents . I discovered this high-tech fraud by India Today, Google, and others when I searched for my case online on December 22, 2024. I immediately wrote to the news reporter who covered the story from India Today, namely Kanu Sarda Rajdeep Sardesai. The lady responded with an email and expressed curiosity to know what was wrong about the article. However, when I explicitly explained the issues to her, there was no response & later an illogical & manipulative response was given by indiatoday avoiding all valid points? The same was the case with others. Below are some points that explain how the article by India Today is misleading and factually and legally incorrect;
1. The petition was primarily against government bodies, including the Prime Minister’s Office, Minority Commission, Jammu and Kashmir Police, and City Munsif J&K Lower Court .Google and others were made parties due to collusion between government bodies and private firms (Google). Therefore, stating that ‘Google ex-employee’ Zahid approached the Supreme Court regarding religious bias at Google is factually and legally incorrect and highly misleading.
2. India Today fraudulently mentions that I raised a complaint with the Minority Commission ,however, no such complaint was ever made by me. This was done to switch the blame.
3. India Today also fraudulently mentions that the case was in the labor court,however, the fact is that the complaint at the Labor Court of Haryana was closed in 2019, where Google ended up purchasing the whole court, including the lawyer I had hired at that time.
4. I never asked for reinstatement. this question was included by the ex-Chief Justice of India, Mr. D Y Chandrachud, on his own. I only asked for the letters that Google and the Ministry of Minority Affairs (MOMA) claimed they had sent to me, and the case was closed based on these fraudulent statement by the respondents by acting in a state of collusion with each other. I also asked for the response to the letter that minority ministry sent to Google CEO Mr. Sundar Pichai and asked him to respond within 15 days back in 2021. Google has also given a defamatory and fraudulent statement to a media firm, namely Free Press Kashmir. Competent forums have taken no action against Google ?
The dismissal report by the ex-CJI of India, Shri D Y Chandrachud, for Case No. 493/2024 is not only anti-constitutional and against the law but also raises several questions about how Kashmiris like me are treated by the judiciary, media, and other competent forums in India!? A review petition was filed by me on 3rd oct. 2024 & the same is pending in the Supreme Court of india Supreme Court Judgments since then ?
-
UYour entire argument sounds like a victimhood narrative rather than a solid legal case. If India Today, Live Law & others truly misreported facts the right way to address it is through legal channels like a defamation or misinformation case not by making sweeping accusations of “high-tech fraud” and collusion.
Stop playing the religion and victim card. There are plenty of people from different religions who face legal challenges, have you ever seen them playing the victim card for not getting justice?
-
Uif you want more info , u can send me your email id I will send you all details . You can have any opinion of mine I won’t mind , especially from a country whose judiciary has literally mentally tortured me by giving smart delay tactics ? I dnt like it if I am used as an Indian in United Nations & at the same time singled out by Supreme Court just because govt. staff is at fault? You are not that fool that your basic cognitive functions won’t prick you to think that “ how come google is silent when a media giant namely India-today accuses Google of religious discrimination against it employee? That speaks volumes , advocate Sahiba ! Never judge a book by cover. I am raising awareness through out the globe I hv posted in international communities aswell ? Y can’t you see that? World is full of critics try to be an encourager??
-
-
U>Stop playing the religion and victim card. There are plenty of people from different religions who face legal challenges, have you ever seen them playing the religion card for not getting justice?
This is uncalled for specially in a country where Shekhar Yadav like judges live and give hate speech.
I have no problem in agreeing with you on the nature of his comment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SYour post is generic and does not have a substantial legal issue involved.
If you have questions about this removal, please [contact the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/LegalAdviceIndia).
-
CHi OP, I am sorry that you have to go through this. Probably, you have posted your issue here to spread awareness.
>
Some comments mentioning that you have posted in reddit subs belonging to our neighbours. I assume that if someone believes that they were denied justice, they may end up taking not so wise decisions because of the state of mind that they are in. Please be kind.
>
TECHNICALS
The article that OP posted nowhere mentions the fact that HOW OP was discriminated against. The article only mentions a legal question. OP raised his issue as Religious Discrimination against the party( not falling under article 12). Infringement of fundamental Rights by a party(not falling under Article 12). Recent constitutional bench judgement (kaushal kishor vs UP) only deals with Article 19 and Article 21. I am not going into the details.
>
OP’s issue is covered in Article 15. Article 15 has to to read with Article 14. Article 14, 19 & 21 are called “GOLDEN TRIANGLE of Indian Constitution.” Clever articulation of OP’s SUIT is the need of the hour.
>
Yes it can be done. Discrimination in any form(Article 15, 17(untouchability)), even by actors not falling under Article 12, should be dealt under Article 32/226.
-
