- This topic has 55 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
-
-
RTrust, she has done a lot for the laws for men as no one is talking about it .
She’s getting immensely famous but its for a cause and her stand on it .I have seen her protest at many places for Atul Subhash which no one is doing.
As per my gut , she’s doing good and let her be richer due to this.
-
-
-
UShe does not counsel any men. Give me name of one.
Those protest were organized by MRA’s. She was only a part of it.
-
RBro who else is there standing for men rights ? Can you suggest any other than her ?? Any name ? Apart from the lawyers trying to upload videos with threat to fill their pockets .
-
-
-
RYou cannot feel my pain bro , you have one agenda . Go ahead with it and spoil her name to fulfill your wish
-
-
UJaise bhai you’re putting your opinion/experience, OP is also doing the same. Why would a person anonymously propagate any agenda against someone?
-
-
-
-
UCan you share some of those resources. I follow amish aggarwala on ytb speaks a lot about these stuff and how to handle them, then Legal Shots that breakdown legal judgements (not just matrimonial) and shows what was the case, and what judgement the court made using which laws, how they interpreted it, etc.
-
RI follow some on YT such as Dhiraj Kumar , Soni law , Mukesh agyani , Soch par prahar , lexspeak and mohini mona .
For blogs , you can check from LawBhoomi ,Lawctopus, Indian Kanoon, legal bites, legally India etc.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SIf you are concerned about her taking donation while working on a social cause that no one talks about – you are the problem bro.
In a time where even SC has discarded the petition to form Men’s commission, you should be thankful that someone is willing to help.
I guess there are only selected few who are working actively on ground. Sure they cant help all, but the point is they help where they can.-
UOnly because, someone propogate her work on SM, does not mean they are only working.
Sorry state of affairs ! Men are simp at the end when a female is on stage.
-
UShe has done a lot more than what no one has even dared to do, especially being a woman. I would always recommend her.
Good forbid, if you or your family go through such situations, such people like her are a blessing to have on your side.
-
UCan you check her twitter timeline.
Many are there. Counsel and give litigation tips to gather evidence through RTI. The rest argument is done by lawyers.
Let me ask you a question, if you want to know a spouse income though publicly available data. How will you do it. Search from her timeline and gather data how to fight cases.
-
ULawyers come secondary in this situation who are basically helpless as can be evidently derived from Atul Subhash case and many more. Fighting in courts is a life long battle and very less chance of justice and while you are fighting you are arming your enemy in the name of alimony, a double blow to men.
I didn’t know I would ever say this but such men need voice and people like Deepika B and others help with that.
You are right that many are there but as of now sounds like she is the one who is most vocal about it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
UCan you show something to support your claims. I have seen similar claims in the sub before. I don’t really know her except that she’s a men’s right activist who started this work after her family became a victim of her sister in law. The first time i saw her was during this atul Subhash case.
-
-
UThe link:-
-
-
-
-
-
-
U
-
-
-
UShare some links or screenshots of your claims. Otherwise it looks like you are talking out of your ass.
-
-
-
-
-
-
UYou’re wrong. She’s doing god’s work. Even if she’s earning i am happy about it. I wish she makes a fortune out of it instead of corrupt policemen and the judiciary.
-
-
-
SThat image could be edited. I agree see does not take all cases. No ngo is limitless. That is why we need equal laws. But that language and ur accusations don’t ring true to me
-
-
-
-
UShe has had success in bringing a few serial false rape case filers to justice because some victims reported them and lawyers offered free legal assistance.
Curiously, in this country, everyone, including affected men themselves feel that men’s causes are genuine only when a woman speaks for them. This is problematic on many levels.
But she is also a grifter: a person who paid money to settle cases against her own family, and is now recouping that money and more by suddenly donning the role of an activist in others’ people’s causes. The advice she offers is basic – get bail in false cases, fight back, etc. For ‘voluntary’ contributions, she will run online smear campaigns to make the ‘victim’ feel better, almost a parallel justice system. In contested individual matters, she has not been able to get relief for parties – see the Dhankar child custody case, for example, because her playbook is too simple to work everywhere – create noise with social media mobs and make the police register cases.
-
