- This topic has 52 replies, 48 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
SSuppose I marry a girl who earns more than me and then we get a divorce. Will I get the alimony or do I have to pay her the alimony inspite of earning less than her?
In a little different scenario, what if I earn more than her but she has a higher net worth than me. What would happen in this case?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HA few cases where men recieved maintenance from their wives…
-
ADo you know Shweta Tiwari paid alimony to her first husband ? Raja Chaudhary….
Hire Raja chaudhary’s lawyer. Prove yourself incapable in the right context and get the alimony only if she earns more than you. Hiring a good lawyer is a deal here…
-
SIt’s a common and false rumor women use to minimise and justify misandrist laws in India
Shweta tiwari never paid any alimony. She just transferred the ownership of a flat they owned jointly solely to raja, in return for a quick divorce and raja going no contact with their daughter
Men in India can only get alimony if they’re completely destitute and/or handicapped to the extent they can’t do any work
Women on the other hand get alimony as long as they earn less than thier husbands, even if the difference is not substantial. Hell there even have been cases where the courts have provided alimony to women who earned MORE than thier husbands
-
AThere are many common people cases as well… but if that makes your delusional life happy be it… you are man at the end of the day… who only thinks all the injustice happens to them in the world… that only men provide … only they pay on dates… only they get cheated…
It’s alright… I don’t want quarrel and try to change your mind … 🙏 whatever makes you happy. Believe that!
-
QCalm down your horses ma’am.. none of what you said is relevant to the conversation held on this thread. Stop trying to push your victim card.. the conversation is about legalities of a particular law here and what certain circumstances can entail.. either you bring factual/logical discussions to the table or do not comment.. this thread is not seeking emotional answers
-
ASir I gave advice which wasn’t emotional… you don’t like it… it’s you said women don’t pay any alimony… when you said this it was not emotional but practical … when I said whatever I said, it still isn’t liked by you … in that case you should calm down ! Because tum karo to waah waah , ham kare hayye hayye … is constant from your side !
-
Q🤨 you gave an advice? Where, what?
>It’s you said women don’t pay any alimony
When did i say anything like that..
If english isn’t your first/second language, i can understand.. feel free to write in hindi if you want to express yourself.. i would respect a well written thoughtful answer.. not whatever you have written in the above 2 comments of yours.. they make absolutely no sense whatsoever.. please learn better how to express your thoughts or have a discussion..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B
Let’s start with the basics: **alimony**. The whole idea of alimony in India is about **financial support** after a divorce. It’s not about who earns more or less, but about **who’s better off and who needs the support**. The court looks at **several factors** — not just income, but also lifestyle, earning capacity, and how the separation impacts your financial situation.
1. **If your wife earns more than you**: No, just because she makes more doesn’t mean you’re automatically out of luck and won’t get alimony if you need it. But let’s be real — if she’s doing well financially, the court’s probably not going to favor you getting alimony unless you can prove that you can’t support yourself. If you’re just sitting around doing nothing, **that’s on you**. You’re not going to get a free ride just because you’re too lazy to work.
2. **If you earn more, but she has more assets**: Money isn’t just about monthly income — **assets matter too**. If you’re raking in more monthly but she has a bigger net worth (say, through inheritance, investments, etc.), it could affect the outcome. But generally, the court focuses on who’s better off *now* and who needs the support. They’ll look at your income, her income, and how much **you** can reasonably earn in the future. If you’re the one capable of working and earning more, don’t expect to sit back and demand alimony just because she’s got a big bank balance.
3. **Claiming you’re mentally retarded to get out of work**: Oh, **come on**. Don’t insult yourself with that crap. The court’s not going to buy some excuse like that unless you genuinely have medical proof that you’re incapable of working. Saying you’re “mentally retarded” when you just don’t feel like working will get you absolutely **nowhere**. They’ll see through that, and you’ll just come off looking lazy. You’re **not going to get away** with this if you’ve got the ability to work but just don’t want to. Courts aren’t fools, and they won’t entertain these kinds of nonsense claims.
4. **Unemployed, zero net worth**: If you don’t have any money, then the court can’t exactly force you to pay alimony — **but** that’s if you’re truly broke. If you’re living with your parents and doing nothing, the court will still consider your future earning capacity. If you’re capable of working and earning, they’ll make sure you get a job, whether you like it or not. So, don’t think you can just sit around and call yourself “unemployed.” **They’ll make sure you get off your ass and contribute** if they have to.
5. **The cousin and the weed-addict example**: Yeah, I get it. You’ve got an example of a guy who’s a weed addict and still getting by because he helps his dad in a business. Well, that’s his life. But don’t expect the same treatment if you’re sitting around doing nothing. The system doesn’t give free passes for laziness. Your situation isn’t going to work like his, and even if he’s a mess, it doesn’t change the fact that you’re capable of doing more than just relying on your parents.
So, **bottom line**: You can’t just sit back and expect to get alimony because you’re “struggling” or because your wife makes more. The court’s going to look at **who’s actually in need**. If you can work, they’ll expect you to, and if you’re just being lazy or trying to claim you’re mentally retarded to avoid work, don’t expect the court to be sympathetic. **Get a job**, **earn your living**, and if alimony comes into play, it’ll be based on real needs, not lazy excuses.
Grow up, take responsibility, and stop thinking the world owes you something just because you’re too lazy to work.
-
LThe reason for Alimony is not just lack of support, it’s the lack of cumulative job experience due to years of homemaking making the unemployed party continue to be unemployable in their chosen sector.
Because everything else works the same for men and women. Future employability is a nebulous thing to judge such cases by because both men and women have the same opportunities in the future according to the measures mentioned here.
-
-
-
-
-
SUncleji an average 23yo can beat the shit out of your middle aged ass.
Your wife likely gets railed by her boss in the garb of working late and ur daughters are likely not biologically urs either -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CWhat if I simply deny that I will not give single penny after divorce ..what will be the worst case scenario..they will put me in jail or auction my property to give her the alimony ..if I don’t have that much to give even if my all property to auctioned ..wht will happen ..I have not done any murder or anything..that they will put me in jail for lyf long or hang me ?
-
-
-
-
-
-
SWhy are there so many people replying who don’t know the law at all? Alimony is granted when it’s proven in court via proper documents that the spouse is incapable of maintaining their livelihood if the divorce happens and that the divorce is happening because that other richer spouse is the reason of the said divorce. If the other party has a source of income they will not get alimony. It’s not who has more or earns more it’s if the other party will be able to eat and live once marriage is dissolved. Also a good lawyer is mandatory as many lawyers drag the cases and take money from opposite party to not settle favourably. And of course whoever gets the kids, if any, gets child maintenance when the other party has considerable income/wealth.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SYour post/comment has been removed because it appears to be a hypothetical scenario or academic question, violating Rule 3. This subreddit is for real legal issues.
If you have questions about this removal, please [contact the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/LegalAdviceIndia).
-
