Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
RI might be wrong but isn’t this ruling because that’s literally how adultery is defined in the laws ? As in it requires an element of sexual intercourse. I think what she did is wrong too but idk if it’s wise to extend the law beyond its text unless the parliament amends itRI see. But there is a need to settle this matter to a substantial degree to prevent chilling effects. The fact that there aren’t even principles or guidelines on how to determine these terms is scaryRArticle 19 is the centeral and only article that deals with freedom of speech. And well the problem is the article is very very vague
The text says that it can be limited by law for reasonable restrictions for the afformentioned grounds “decency ” and “morals” but these things aren’t defined anywhere
