- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
-
-
-
PFace value in court. If arguments raised by all three may be similar, but the more expensive lawyers will likely be heard better by the judges, if that makes sense.
-
SI get it, so the person asking for 20k/hr is a VP level member of bar association of that court and should be value for money. The one with 80k/hr has a lot of associates so I guess they are charging 80k/hr for hand holding.
-
-
-
H1. Face Value – Lawyers who charge high fees have typically proven themselves in court and earned respect from litigants, fellow lawyers, and judges. Many senior advocates are not only more experienced but may also be a senior in the profession who the judges know personally from their younger days. Their extensive knowledge and credibility often make judges more inclined to accept their arguments.
2. Experience – A senior advocate possesses significantly more experience and legal acumen than an average lawyer. Even the most expensive lawyer once started at the bottom and worked their way up, handling a wide range of cases and strategies. This exposure enables them to quickly assess the opposing side’s approach and devise effective counterstrategies. With a more expensive lawyer, you are more likely to take proactive measures rather than being on the defensive.
3. Trust Factor – A major concern by litigants is that their lawyers may be compromised by the opposing side and end up screwing their case. Senior advocates, who charge higher fees, have their reputation at stake, making such compromises highly unlikely.
That said, a higher fee does not automatically mean a better advocate for your case. Like a civil law expert may not be suited for a criminal case. Choosing the right lawyer for your case requires due diligence. Additionally, high-profile lawyers often have demanding schedules, which may limit the attention they can devote to your case compared to a mid or low level advocate.
-
