Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
AThere are two conditions laid down in Pramod Surya pawar Vs State of Maharashtra
The promise of marriage must have been givn a in Bad faith with No intentions of being adhered to at the time it was given
And second false promises must be immediate relevance or direct nexus to women’s decision for engagement in sexual act .
Now check for your self whether before or around your “eventual Elopement” did you play hushband &wife on WhatsApp and you need to show that right from the beginning stage of relationship itself you had no Serious intention to marry the compaliantFrom My understanding go for Quashing of FIR rather Than anticipatory bail and u may demand in alternative in Quashing of petition that ACCUSED may be granted A.bail if HC do not quash the said FIR and if HC do not quash you can challenge it in SC cause u r in kind of LUCK casue SC recently expressed its concern over misuse of Rape Sections after break up of consensual relationship .
AIf he goes it will strengthen her case for alimony that hushband have all the money in the world , and escaping abroad only lengthen the process since he doesn’t acquire citizenship his passport can be cancelled and warrant may be served on embassy for his deportationACriminal case cannot proceed in the absence of accused.. though accused may ask for presence via video conferencing given such infrastructure is available in the court , butt since district court’s lacks basic infrastructure and skilled person to conduct proceedings they may not be inclined to allow it .
