Forum Replies Created
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
-
Posts
-
AAlong with that some lawyers will charge a % fee for settlement/claims/alimony as a deal which they are not allowed to do. In so many family dispute cases the lawyers from both sides collude to extend the case as long as possible so they can keep getting paid per appearance. Imagine there are huge bundles of currency notes burning in your store and all you get is a transfer and paid vacation. Whatever they say, the process of law is opaque.AOP has not mentioned the age of the person, OP has also mentioned both parents are Indian Citizen even though they were of Nepalese origin. So its a deduction from that the person in question was/is Indian citizen by birth.AIndia has not removed citizenship by birth. [source ](https://indiancitizenshiponline.nic.in/)ANAL: The story doesn’t add up. Nepalese people don’t look so much different from Indian people that they may raise suspicion at Airports. Have a few Nepalese friends, mostly look almost similar to Indians. If that was the case every person from North-East would face this issue.
India has naturalization by birth. If she is born in India, she is Indian citizen by default.
If she was a minor at the time her parents applied for Nepalese citizenship then she can use it as defence, but why will they search her phone at immigration? And if she is knowingly carrying Nepalese citizenship then she is at fault.
I don’t think this is a straight story. Hidden facts may be?
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)