Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
IUnder the Indian Contract Act, 1872, any agreement made by fraud or coercion is voidable at the victim’s option. You can try canceling the loan agreement in court.II think the best course of action would be to inform the lenders that the loan was taken out through impersonation.
If your friend used your documents without your consent, this qualifies as fraud. The lenders likely wouldn’t have approved the loan if they had known it was actually him applying.
You should consider having a serious conversation with your friend by letting him know that if he doesn’t repay the loan, you’ll have no choice but to file a police report (FIR). Impersonation is a criminal offense, and Section 319 of the BNS Act specifically addresses it.
IRegarding the testimony of your Aunt you can refer to Section 118 of Indian Evidence Act 1872. She is indeed qualified to testify.II believe your aunt can still testify provided she remembers correctly.A better piece of evidence would be wedding pictures.
Also as per my basic understanding of the law the burden is on the state to prove the jewellery was obtained from tainted money. So what proof have they put forward?
IIn addition to this if you can get bank locker deposit records and if the records indicate that the deposit was made before the offence came into existence maybe then you can prove your version. Please note whatever I have said is not legal advise.IAre you in touch with any relatives or guests who attended your mothers wedding?An affidavit from them supporting your version can help prove the legitimacy of purchase.
OR you can use the wedding pictures of your mother wearing the jewellery to prove your point.
