An excellent explanation. Thank you! ๐
I have a question that’s been bothering me regarding the execution of justice in India for quite sometime.
This is regarding the cases where the crime was committed with pure malintent. (Such as those involving for example, acts of jealousy and entitlement).
What are your thoughts and opinions about when such cases see a reduced sentence or the accused walks free due to a technical reason.
What is your take (meant for everyone) on defence lawyers that fight for these things for people in these circumstances?
I think the technical failing is still a valid and necessary thing that needs to be upheld, in the same spirit as the explanation that has been given. But what about the unfairness the victim and his kin experience following this, along with any possible acts of retribution.
Is there a just resolution for situations like these?
Edit – Typos.