[Primeabhijeet1498]

P

Primeabhijeet1498
PARTICIPANT
March 24, 2025 at 9:00 pm

Morally no, as he cheated.
Ideally yes, he’s a cab driver and you’re a gov employee. You earn a lot more than him.

Share

[Primeabhijeet1498]

P

Primeabhijeet1498
PARTICIPANT
March 24, 2025 at 8:56 pm

So you mean that current state of execution of alimony is perfect?
The alimony should be given by the spouse even if he’s earning less? How does it make sense?
Moreover, the mother majority of the times gains the custody of the kids even in no fault divorce.

Moreover, the issue of men not actively taking part in raising the children is sorted by child support right? That’s not exactly alimony.
I’m talking about the assets here, not child support.

Share

[Primeabhijeet1498]

P

Primeabhijeet1498
PARTICIPANT
March 24, 2025 at 9:55 am

And I’m not against alimony but it should be done in a calculative manner. The way its done in western countries and the child support is proportionately divided.
(although it’s still biased towards women even in the west)
In our country, no matter what, it’s almost always the man who is paying even if he earns less.
So many times the man has to pay even when he faces domestic violence.

Share

[Primeabhijeet1498]

P

Primeabhijeet1498
PARTICIPANT
March 24, 2025 at 7:46 am

The execution is certainly not gender neutral. It’s entirely unfair. The court even asks unemployed men to find work and provide alimony to the wife.
Child support is to be paid by both the parents. The law heavily exploits men.

Share

[Author]

Posts