Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
RProperty disputes are time taking, be it inside court or outside.
1. File a criminal case of fraudulently and dishonesty producing a will, and getting it registered. You may or may not name the tehsildar as accomplice. But you should name the driver and servant as accomplice, along with your mama and his sons as main culprits. If the police doesn’t file the FIR, approach the court and get it registered under section 175 of BNSS.
2. The allegedly forged will must have been produced by forging your Nana’s signatures. Demand for an FSL test done on the authenticity of the signatures. This you can do in Sohna court, as well as in the criminal case that you file. For this, gather documents of your Nana’s signatures of recent past. That will help in proving your case.
3. Find a better lawyer. Judicial system is a message, and unethical lawyers (who forget the first principle of keeping their loyalty to their clients) make it worse. Yes, pay will be higher, but it is needed for higher rewards.
4. If you can, prove it on record that your Mama never took care of your Nana.
5. If your Nana’s property is ancestral (which means it is inherited to him from his father or even beyond), then your mother and her sisters can file a joint claim to their share of the property anyway. This you can do via a separate case in a court where its jurisdiction is.6. Most importantly – if Mama ka beta is congress candidate, then you have BJP ka MLA who won. Approach him, find a contact, go to his morning jansunvaayi, and tell him your grievances. He will get you a way into police. But still, be ready for some under the table demands at various steps. If the SHO still doesn’t help, approach ACP/DCP of your area.
That’s all I can think of. Lawyer up, and be ready for all this, including (may be) death threats from your mama’s side.
RPretty bad.
You had sexual relationship with a girl who wanted to have a long term future with you. That’s having sexual intercourse on pretext of marriage, called as r*pe. Since it happened/started 2 years ago, IPC will apply (depends on the case she makes). Section 376.BNS has made it more clear with such kind of things. Sex on pretext of marriage or any other benefit, and has a separate (but lower) sentence for such case.
Although you seemed to focus only on the physical part. But she has screenshots of your chatting, and her dedication towards your relationship will show, and will also put you in bad light. And that is enough to prove your case.
So, I’ll suggest you to try to get out of the legal message, and manage it outside of purview of law. Basically meeting her demands of an apology, etc.
RNo crime made out. You had a disagreement over the type and expenses of wedding function. This does not come under the definition of dowry as per Dowry Prevention Act, 1861.RIt won’t change circumstances for application of pocso act, but it would also invite Juvenile justice act. The act that governs how “children in conflict with law” (the legal term for under 18 criminals) are treated. That basically means no jail, no handcuffs, no police custody in police station, child detention centers, and early bail and very less term of punishment.RIt won’t change circumstances for application of pocso act, but it would also invite Juvenile justice act. The act that governs how “children in conflict with law” (the legal term for under 18 criminals) are treated. That basically means no jail, no handcuffs, no police custody in police station, child detention centers, and early bail and very less term of punishment.RComplain on 1930 or cybercrime.gov.in portal. Say that the caller pretended to be your friend and asked for money citing distress. The complaint will be forwarded to your concerned police district. They can help you get your money back, if it is still in the first 2-3 accounts.
Try it. No harm in trying.RHE IS NOT SAFE! Although POCSO is a gender neutral law, but this particular case largely depends on who reports first to the Police. If the girl files and FIR alleging rape, the boy may be tried, and considered a “child in conflict with the law” under the Juvenile Justice act. If the boy files the complaint, the girl might be tried under POCSO. Depends on circumstances of this case, i.e. chatting, room booking, who made advances etc.Also, DO NOT MENTION TO THE POLICE THAT SHE SAID SHE WAS 16. I cannot highlight this anymore.
