Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
SFiling of a criminal complaint or FIR is not mandatory, but an intimation of the incident helps set the case up for claims to be filed on the civil side.
The car technically becomes case property in the criminal proceedings but the same can be released by moving an application for release of vehicle on superdari.
SSo our limitation argument is somewhat out the window.Be that as it may, I would respond to the legal notice with the complete set of facts through a local counsel. At times companies evaluate cost of litigation against actual recoveries and more often than not it just isn’t in the best financial interest of the company to actively litigate. This, however, is pure speculation.
I would say check your agreements for a dispute resolution clause and things would proceed accordingly.
SI would suggest getting in touch with a locally practicing counsel or a clerk to a counsel, as the practice varies greatly from state to state.SIdeally the electricity department ought to have filed a claim before the motor accident claims tribunal, which is the usual practice where I am from, and then your insurance company would be called to make good any loss suffered on account of the accident as is good likelihood that your vehicle had adequate insurance to cover for the damage caused.I would start with checking the policy documents to verify if this sort of an accident would be covered under the policy, if they are, you could respond to the complaint filed with the ground that the same has been filed at the wrong forum if the claim is only regarding compensation.
The police could still act if there is reason to believe that the vehicle was being driven rashly and negligently under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and corresponding provisions of the electricity act.
Rest, I could help further if I had greater details.
SFirst things to consider is whether or not there was a term specified in the agreement/affidavit you are referring to and if there are other terms at play.I would begin with issuing a legal notice seeking recovery of dues. If they do not pay upon notice you would be required to initiate a civil suit before a court of competent jurisdiction.
If it was a cash transaction you would have to prove how and where the amount was paid? Did you legally have access to funds in cash at the time? As per a recent Supreme Court judgement all cases containing mention of cash transactions above 2 lakh have to be reported to Income Tax Authorities. (The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution versus B. Gunashekar & Another, Civil Appeal No. 5200 of 2025)
SThe information relating to FIRs and trials are mostly public record, barring the actual evidence led the orders and the FIR itself should all be available on the websites.A question would arise here if you were charged in the case and faced trial or not? The word dismissal is rather vague as the court could have discharged you or acquitted you both of which would have different legal ramifications. The status of appeals, if any, would also have to be looked into.
Be that as it may, the passport offices are primarily concerned with prior convictions and pending cases more than anything else. However, in case you were involved in a criminal investigation but the charges against you were dropped you might be called to submit certifications qua the same. I can’t say with certainty without the full set of facts about your situation.
As for government serve, the conditions of the specific advertisement/notification for the job would have to be looked into. Normally, only crimes involving “moral turpitude”, convictions, etc., cause hurdles but again it is not exhaustive.
SThere are some preliminary questions which would be crucial here, firstly at the time of delivery of assets and return thereof were there any documents/receipts executed? Furthermore, most companies at the time of settling accounts and issuing certificates usually entails some form of acknowledgement from the company, I would cross-check those documents for any sort of reference/proof of return.Secondly, this is from a litigation perspective, the notice would disclose as to whether they are contemplating initiating civil recovery from your brother or not, civil recoveries have to be initiated within, ordinarily, 3 years of accrual of a cause of action. In your case, the cause of action would arise when the notice period stood served and your brother got relieved. So more than 3 years have already elapsed from your brother being relieved, even if they initiate any action the likelihood of the action being successful is bleak, owing to it possibly being barred by limitation.
The advise above is in preliminary and based on the limited information you have provided and I’d advice you to consult a professional with the complete set of facts to get a better grasp of things.
