Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
UāShe promised no one will talk to me like that againā
She speaks as if she has a say in how things will pan out. And yet had to message you from a burner account. Her mind is writing cheques that her reality canāt cash.
Thereās no point in her apologising to you. Unless her dad calls and apologises personally, thereās no future here. You should bolt.
UNAL but even if the filings would be separate, once the magistrate takes note that a divorce case has already been filed wouldnāt they transfer the case to the family court so the cases can be heard together as one?UIf you donāt have a reference then Google is your friend. There are several websites for legal services where you can consult a lawyer.The top two options that showed up for me after a quick search are legalkart.com and onelegalindia.com.
UNALI suggest you book an appointment with a lawyer and consult on the matter by sharing the agreement and getting a proper brief from him. It wonāt cost you heaven and earth and it is worth the investment.
Bonds cannot be legally enforced in India as far as Iām aware but it all depends on the agreement and what constitutes the ābondā here.
Iād be extremely wary of giving them a cheque. Do not consider giving a cheque for an account which doesnāt have sufficient balance, the cheque will bounce and thatās an offence. Do not consider giving a cheque and then calling the bank and cancelling it because that amounts to a dishonoured cheque as well and they can still initiate legal proceedings against you. The bank will definitely levy penalties as well.
UI donāt mean to sound harsh but you need to accept the reality for your own benefit. You ARE naive AF right now.I mean, seriously, the GLOBAL head of operations for Puma?! Really? And you fell for that?
You genuinely thought that the global head of operations for Puma is staying at a cheap hostel of all places? Sleeping on a bunk bed in a dorm with strangers? And you didnāt think of looking him up on LinkedIn or on Pumaās website? Took me all of 30 seconds to Google the names of Pumaās top management.
And to top it off, you really thought the global head of operations of an almost 80 year old sportswear brand, a company with presence in pretty much every country in the world and employs people like Virat Kohli, Charles Leclerc, and Dua Lipa as their brand ambassador is asking you to loan him a few thousand rupees??
Dude..these people donāt even pay their own bills. Their secretaries/support staff handle their hotel, flights, and other expenses. At best, they might swipe their corporate card for some of the bills, if at all. If he needed to transfer money, especially an amount thatās nothing more than a tip for them, heād just drop a message to his secretary and sheād handle it.
And you have the audacity to say you arenāt as naive as the sub is portraying you? If anything, no oneās pointed out the full extent of your naĆÆvetĆ© š
Take it as an important life lesson that cost you ā¹13k and move on.
UI have been looking for the same and found a few options online. Based on the services offered, I shortlisted WillJini and I am thinking of trying them out. I suggest connecting with them or another service provider of your choice to get the answers youāre looking for and then take a call based on that.[WillJini](https://www.willjini.com)
Uāand they are going to do it after op paysāI have read it again. Canāt find this statement in his post. Can you point it out where exactly is it written?
OP is not obliged to receive anything unless it says so explicitly in the appointment letter. And if he takes it to court, they can simply issue a relieving letter with a negative conduct remark. That will fulfil the āobligationā as per the agreement and he wonāt be able to use it either. The court canāt force the company to issue a positive relieving letter.
His best bet is to speak to his manager who agreed to relieve him and appeal to him to convince the HR with the offer to buy out the remaining 50 days. That is if he really cares about the letter given that he is already abroad.
If all heās worried about is if the company will take any legal action, then he need not bother.
UI donāt know which company youāve worked for that allows this but I do not know a single company that allows an employee to just walk out the door and buy out their entire notice period at their convenience.At the very least, the company demands a certain number of days be served for the handover and all of this is sent on email from their end which includes the number of days to be served and the amount for the buyout, the number of days for which is approved by them. The employee is not paid the salary for the days he has to serve as that amount is considered as partial payment towards his buyout. After he completes the minimum notice that was mentioned in the buyout agreement, he clears the balance and they issue the documents.
UCompany has an email for absconding on record. Theyāll claim that neither did he fulfil his notice period obligations nor did he facilitate a smooth transition which affected their ongoing project adversely resulting in losses to the company. The money paid is towards recouping those losses and doesnāt even cover all of it, nor does it cover his notice period. Not to mention the case will drag on for years and heāll have to pay a lawyer for the time too.He should negotiate to pay the amount for the remaining days only, in exchange for the documents because if he concedes to their demand, it means he acknowledges that his resignation and the 40 day notice period he served had no meaning and he basically accepts that he absconded. They are under no obligation to provide any documents in that case, despite receiving the money.
UWhy would he pay for 92 days when heās already served a 40 day notice? Especially when the HR is saying he wonāt be issuing an experience certificate nor a relieving letter?UFirstly, connect with your insurer to update the nominee for your policy. There may be a KYC procedure involved.As an added measure, get a will made where you declare your mother as the heir. Ensure that you explicitly mention in your will that your wife is not be considered the beneficiary for any of your assets, regardless of being listed as a nominee. Itās not that hard, Google āWill Makingā services local to you or online, theyāll do all of it for you.
Lastly, a nominee does not equate to a beneficiary. The nominee is someone who is empowered to process the paperwork associated with the assets on your behalf, since youāre no longer there. If they want to become the beneficiary, they will have to initiate the due process to become the beneficiary. Being a nominee just simplifies that process as you do not have to prove that youāre the rightful beneficiary.
In case someone else has a legal claim to your assets, they can dispute it in court and still claim what is rightfully theirs despite not being a nominee.
UNAL.I donāt think youāll be saving any time by not hiring a lawyer.
The lawyer will appear in court on your behalf, you donāt always have to be present. So you will either spend time going to court yourself or youāll spend time visiting your lawyer.
Good thing is after meeting your lawyer the first time, something you should do at least once before you hire them, the other conversations can happen over phones and zoom calls. So hiring a lawyer may actually end up saving you more time than not hiring one.
Also, the lawyer will give you the right advice in terms of what to say in court. No reason to wing it in front of a judge.
