[User_22665f7c]

U

User_22665f7c
PARTICIPANT
February 20, 2025 at 7:12 pm

I don’t think you understand the satire of the reply.

Share

[User_22665f7c]

U

User_22665f7c
PARTICIPANT
February 20, 2025 at 5:38 pm

This has not gone before a court. Obviously no sane person will refer to this and reply to court documents.

This is a reply for a baseless case that if it goes to court will be dismissed.

Share

[User_22665f7c]

U

User_22665f7c
PARTICIPANT
February 20, 2025 at 1:05 am

You should ask your lawyer to draft a reply by referring to [Arkell v Pressdram](https://proftomcrick.com/2014/04/29/arkell-v-pressdram-1971/).

If I was you, I would use it to reply first as others mentioned it is illegal and they are using a scaremongering tactic.

Share

[User_22665f7c]

U

User_22665f7c
PARTICIPANT
February 2, 2025 at 11:19 pm

Sorry for your loss and hope he is in a better place now.

Share

[Author]

Posts