User_69b74e59

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • User_69b74e59
    Participant
      U
      User_69b74e59
      OP
      May 6, 2026 at 9:35 pm
      I want to ask you something, are you assuming that Christ falls under the Karnataka State legislation?

      Well, I did try to find what you said…and um…I have news.
      Christ University is a ‘Deemed to be University’.
      The Karnataka State Law University Act doesn’t apply since it’s not affiliated to it…and the Karnataka State Universities Act doesn’t apply since it’s Deemed(which is something given by Central Govt)

      But as far as I can see, the BCI ruling does apply to it…cause like…As a centrally recognized institution, it operates under the authority of the central government, governed by the UGC, placing its core functions under federal jurisdiction rather than state.

      (Though if you can cite your sources, I’d appreciate that)

      User_69b74e59
      Participant
        U
        User_69b74e59
        OP
        May 6, 2026 at 8:42 pm
        Alright, first of all, it’s List III (not List II).

        Secondly, what’s the state jurisdiction meant to do here?(In this post). Law Colleges(or a college having a law program), they all answer to BCI…the BCI is the supreme statutory body for this.
        BCl’s jurisdiction over legal education is precisely WHY this post exists

        User_69b74e59
        Participant
          U
          User_69b74e59
          OP
          May 6, 2026 at 8:22 pm
          Fair point on the jurisdictional limitation of the Delhi HC ruling not automatically binding to Karnataka HC

          …however, the BCI is a national regulatory body whose rules apply to ALL recognised law colleges across India regardless of state. If BCI explicitly caps attendance requirements at 70% and grade penalties at 5%, does a deemed university’s autonomy allow it to exceed these specific BCI regulations?

        Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)