[User_c0ab8fad]

U

User_c0ab8fad
PARTICIPANT
March 19, 2025 at 5:07 am

I didn’t see a mention of an arrest memo not being made in your case. That’s why I thought of mentioning it in my comment coz I thought you might have missed the fact that arrest memo was not made.

Share

[User_c0ab8fad]

U

User_c0ab8fad
PARTICIPANT
March 18, 2025 at 8:01 pm

So what the police usually does is that they arrest the person but don’t show him to have been arrested on record. The accused is kept in the police barracks unofficially without any record and after a few days they make the arrest memo and present the accused before the magistrate within 24 hours of making such memo.

Share

[User_c0ab8fad]

U

User_c0ab8fad
PARTICIPANT
March 4, 2025 at 2:02 am

Approach the Rent Controller of your district.

Share

[User_c0ab8fad]

U

User_c0ab8fad
PARTICIPANT
March 4, 2025 at 1:53 am

You can file a cyber crime complaint that someone is impersonating your father online. I think a mere communication from the cyber crime department would make her stop her misdeeds.

Share

[User_c0ab8fad]

U

User_c0ab8fad
PARTICIPANT
March 4, 2025 at 12:58 am

I didn’t know that the apex court of this country started deciding cases as per the personal opinions of the judge. Sounds much like a banana republic. It’s shocking that public morality has taken precedence over constitutional morality in this matter. I didn’t know that Art 21 was a dead piece of legislation coz clearly the Apex Court feels that a person cannot talk about what HE’s going through at HIS show. Apart from this statement being problematic what is appalling is the fact that the SC is dictating to Ranveer that he can only create content which is age appropriate for everyone. I mean why is this onus being placed on Ranveer? I don’t see such age appropriate content restriction being placed on big production houses like AltBalaji. Even the previous statement of the presiding judge that the statement made has shaken his conscience. I wasn’t aware that the restriction against freedom of speech kicked in when the personal conscience of anyone is breached even though the word of law is not. Nothing, as much wrong as it may be, can be prosecuted if the law doesn’t prohibit. Looks like the milords missed this basic principle during their law school days.
Everyday the judicial system of the country breaks my believe in the system and surprisingly it’s done more by the constitutional courts who live in ivory towers and have given themselves such a high stature that they are high principled individuals who cannot be ever wrong and they’re above everyone.
I wouldn’t be surprised if contempt is issued against me if any of the protectors of constitution read this. Lol.

Share

[Author]

Posts