[User_f99fb922]

U

User_f99fb922
PARTICIPANT
January 29, 2025 at 5:55 pm

Rage bait headline. Read the ruling. It simply says the wife has to prove illegitimacy of the child without asking the so called biological father’s dna for paternity test.

If that okay, any woman can go up to any man and demand a paternity test. The court is asking to first prove the child is in fact not of the husband, then show proof that it could be of the accused.

“Stating that the Section provides that conclusive proof of legitimacy is equivalent to paternity, he stressed, “The object of this principle is to prevent any unwarranted inquiry into the parentage of a child. Since the presumption is in favour of legitimacy, the burden is cast upon the person who asserts ‘illegitimacy’ to prove it only through ‘non-access’,” “

Share

[Author]

Posts