Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
BThe car is indeed part of your father’s estate. That means it belongs to the property he left behind and, by law, passes on to his legal heirs, such as you and your mother. However, just because the car is part of his estate does not mean that anyone can take it away from you merely by making allegations. If someone believes your father caused them a financial loss, they are required to prove it in a court of law.
Until a court passes a specific order, you are within your rights to transfer the car to your name as part of your inheritance. Using the car for rental income is also entirely lawful. It does not expose you to legal risk unless you were involved in any wrongdoing.
BVery sorry for your loss.You and your mother are not personally liable for any alleged misconduct or debt related to your father’s work. Under Indian law, if the bank genuinely believes there was financial misconduct, they must establish it through proper legal proceedings. Even if they succeed, they can only recover from the estate left behind by your father, and only to the extent of that estate. Your personal property or future income cannot be taken unless you voluntarily agree to take on such liability, which you are under no obligation to do.
If they are pressuring you to sell your house or other assets, you should not give in unless they provide documentary proof of their claims and obtain a court order. If they harass or threaten you, you may consider filing a police complaint for criminal intimidation. Under Section 351 of the BNS, threatening someone by making imputations against a deceased person can constitute criminal intimidation if it is done with the intent to cause alarm to the family. The law also recognises that imputations made against a deceased person may amount to criminal defamation if the statement would have harmed the person’s reputation while alive and is intended to hurt the feelings of their family. This is covered under Section 356 of the BNS.
I would suggest preserving all communications, including messages and call records, and consulting a local lawyer. A legal notice asking them to cease harassment and to pursue their claims lawfully, if they believe they have any, may help put an end to this pressure.
I am a lawyer based in Delhi and would be happy to help further if you need support.
BSure. I only stepped in because I believe outrage is most powerful when it is well-directed. Dismantling tenant protections altogether may not be the answer, but speeding up adjudication, curbing abuse of process, and ensuring accountability certainly are.BRent control laws were originally designed to protect vulnerable tenants, especially post-Partition and during housing crises. The intention was never to dispossess owners, but to ensure tenants were not arbitrarily thrown out. Over time, courts have diluted the standard of bona fide need to the point that almost any reasonable assertion by a landlord qualifies. So, I am not really sure to whom the outrage is directed. That said, if someone feels strongly, the right place to channel that is through supporting parties that seek to reform these laws.BThank you for your response. The judgment you have cited is a case where the rent control law is not applicable due to ceiling limits in the WB Act.B> I have to add one more thing. Generally, rental agreement with banks have an ARBITRATION clause. All the relevant laws are subject to Arbitration & C act.With respect, I would like to clarify that tenancy disputes, particularly those governed by rent control legislation, are not considered arbitrable under Indian law. The Supreme Court has held in multiple cases that when a special law such as a rent control act confers exclusive jurisdiction on specific authorities or courts, those matters cannot be referred to arbitration, even if there is an arbitration clause in the agreement.
BYes, that definitely helps. If there are already complaints against him at the local police station, that background can strengthen your case when you seek legal protection. However, the remedy we are talking about under the Domestic Violence Act is civil in nature. It does not involve criminal punishment unless there is a violation of a court order. The purpose is to ensure your safety, protect your right to stay in the shared household, and provide financial and emotional security through enforceable court directions.BLawyer here, based in Delhi.Based on what you have described, the law is on your side and there are ways to protect yourself, your mother, and your sister. The abuse, threats, and violence fall under what is recognised as domestic violence, and you all have legal rights regardless of religion. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act applies to your situation and allows you to seek protection from your father’s abusive behaviour. It also allows your mother and you to continue living in the shared household, even if the house is in your father’s name or is inherited. He cannot legally throw you out or force you to leave. If he tries to, or if there is any further violence or threat, you can go to the police and file a complaint. You also have the option of approaching the court to seek a protection order, which would legally restrain him from behaving violently or evicting you. It is also possible to ask for other reliefs, including financial support, through court.
If your mother is unwilling to go to the police directly, a complaint can also be made to the local Protection Officer under the Domestic Violence Act. There are helplines and legal aid services in every state that assist women in such situations. Even though personal law (in your case, Islamic law) governs some aspects of family matters, Indian courts protect women and children from domestic violence through secular laws, and those laws will be applied in court for your protection.
Please preserve any evidence of abusive behaviour, including recordings, messages, or videos if you are ever able to collect them safely.
BLawyer here, based in Delhi.Yes, action can definitely be taken against him. If he has shared confidential information from inside the manufacturing unit without permission, he may be liable both under company policy and the law.
The company should immediately issue him a notice asking him to take down the videos and explain his conduct. If he is a temporary employee, his engagement can also be terminated as per the terms of his contract.
Legally, sharing confidential business or client-related information without authorisation may amount to a breach of trust, and if any non-disclosure clauses were part of his terms of work, those can also be enforced. If the disclosure causes reputational or financial damage, the company may consider civil action for damages or even criminal proceedings depending on the nature of the breach.
The company must also act quickly to protect itself from client liability. That may involve:
* Documenting what information was disclosed.
* Sending takedown requests to YouTube.
* Informing clients proactively if needed, to manage fallout.It is advisable to consult a lawyer familiar with employment and data protection laws so that appropriate steps can be taken without delay.
