Forum Replies Created
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
-
Posts
-
IA lawyer this side. Of course you can stop it. Unless the land was self acquired by father or grandfather, you have a right on it. If you file an injunctive suit at your local court, you can stop the sale from happening. Even if the sale goes through, you can contest it. Even if land goes to third party after sale, you will have a right of election to choose between taking your appropriate portion of land, or its value. You can even go a step further and ask for partition pursuant to which, your portion can’t be sold without your consent.IThat’s not how it works. Also, because drugs act is not my area of practice, I don’t want to reach incorrect conclusions and put you in panic.IThen please visit a psychiatrist. There is no harm. You pay for the medicines anyway, better to get it prescribed. As much as I empathise with you, what you’re doing is definitely illegal. So please, visit a psychiatrist and get them prescribed. All the best for your health. This is coming for a fellow Redditor who is on prescription medicine, and is also a lawyer.IThen stop. Sooner the better. If at all you need any schedule H1 drug, then kindly visit a psychiatrist and get a proper prescription. As a lawyer, I cannot undo what has already been done; nor would I advise you to get any alibi.
Hopefully no one catches it. If and when required, speak with a local lawyer to understand if it is a compoundable offence or not. Maybe you only get to pay a fine that way.IWhat’s the question?
What you do is illegal under the Drugs Act. I believe you’re aware of that already.ILawyer here. This is a quick summary. Hope it helps. 1. If loan is secured, then it is recovered by banks by liquidating the secured assets. 2. If unsecured, then by liquidating the self acquired properties of the borrower. 3. If any family member (non-minor) signed as a guarantor, then they are liable for repayment as much as the borrower. 4. Ancestral property share of the borrower can be utilised by banks.
This is a very general and basic understanding. Individual cases might lead to different responses basis the facts. Speak with a local lawyer before acting on this response.IA lawyer here. Interesting question (from legal point of view). Personal laws are different for different religions. If Hindu laws apply to you, then I believe you can separate from them, and don’t inherit or take any assets from them. In that case you won’t be held responsible to maintain your parents. I don’t think emancipation is legally possible in India. In either case, you’re already an adult, so emancipation is out of question.
Still, before acting on any advice, speak with a lawyer.ILegally speaking they are not blocking you. About the indirect block as a result of seeking a cost, it will be decided basis the cost itself. There have been cases wherein a fee of Rs. 5 has also been called illegal, but there were additional reasons for same. Here, I’m not sure if those argument can be made.IA lawyer here.
There comes a time wherein you must realise if an action is worthwhile of not. Yes, you can go to consumer court. I believe NCRCD website has the templates and performas needed to file the complaint. But I would say don’t. The cost would be more than recovery. And if you want to use it as a ‘slap’ on Lenskart, then you might not succeed. I guess they also have a fair case that they can make for charging a fee.
Don’t use Lenskart next time.IA declaration/undertaking made unilaterally by one individual which puts duties/onus on the family or any third person, is not legally maintainable. What you explain here seems to be a form of guarantee. And guarantee is a tripartite contract. You need three parties. In your case it seems there are only two. One exception to the same is that it’s still possible to make a recovery by liquidating the self acquired assets of the said individual. Still, visit a local lawyer/advocate to better discuss the issue.IBoth the professions i.e. doctors and advocates (not lawyers) are self regulated by AIMA and BCI. Self regulation has always been about ensuring quality and to reducing malpractice. As much as I agree that the legal fees have been exorbitant of late, it’s difficult to regulate the price. It’s a service, and people decide whose service they want and how much are they willing to pay for it. It’s same as dining options, which starts from pain puri and goes all the way to Michelin star fine dining. They both have their reasons to exist, and people decide what they want and can have. Btw I’m a lawyer (not an advocate).
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)