Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
KSo, are looks and quick results supposed to matter more than safety now? If that’s the case, what’s even the point of all this?
Honestly, the laws are stacked against you — and unless you approach things carefully and smartly, you’re setting yourself up to lose.
Maybe luck has been on your side so far, but don’t rely on it — it always runs out sooner or later.
Sorry if I sound pessimistic, but marriage these days feels like a gamble, and good men are getting torn apart in court by wolves due to one bad decision.
KWhat is the exact reason that you want to get married and risk your family’s well being and assets?Your wife does not even earn as much as you do.
Also, since she is earning you cant expect her to be of much help with domestic chores.
So what value does a marriage add to your life?
KIn addition to this, if you’ve clearly and explicitly communicated that marriage might not be possible because of family-related issues, and she still chose to continue the relationship with you, that can be a key point in your favor. It shows you were honest about your intentions from the start, and that there was no attempt to mislead or manipulate her into a relationship under false promises. That kind of transparency goes a long way in showing there was no deliberate deception.KPlease note that the following is not legal advise:For an offence under Section 69 of the BNS Act to occur the following two ingredients are required:
1. The promise of marriage must be “false” from the outset.
2. The false promise must be directly linked to the victim’s decision to engage in the sexual act.
To counter such an allegation, it is crucial to demonstrate that the relationship was based on good faith and evolved over time based on mutual consent, emotional connection, and continued association, rather than arising solely from a singular promise of marriage. This helps challenge the assertion that the alleged promise was the immediate or exclusive cause of the relationship.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision in Prashant Bharti vs. State of NCT of Delhi is particularly relevant here. The Court observed that it is inconceivable, that the complainant or any woman would continue to meet the Appellant or maintain a prolonged association or physical relationship with him in the absence of voluntary consent on her part.
In support of this, digital records such as WhatsApp messages, emails, call logs, or social media interactions can serve as crucial evidence. These can help establish whether the relationship was manipulative or whether it was a genuine, evolving bond between two consenting individuals.
The only potentially complex aspect in your matter appears to be the issue of elopement. However, if there was ongoing communication and association between the two of you after the elopement, it can further reinforce the argument that the decision was not driven solely by a fraudulent inducement. Rather, it was a deliberate and informed choice made by both individuals.
To strengthen this position, it is important that you provide a plausible, genuine reason for why the marriage ultimately did not materialize. Factors such as family opposition, financial instability, personal aspirations, or evolving circumstances can help demonstrate that the breakdown of the relationship was due to subsequent developments—not because of any deceitful intent from the beginning.
Any documentary evidence—such as communications that reference the elopement, discussions about marriage, or conversations reflecting on the nature of the relationship—can be pivotal. These materials can show that both parties weighed the consequences and realities of their decisions, lending weight to the argument that the elopement was an informed decision rather than a blind leap based on a false promise.
KYour attempt to downplay the seriousness of male suicide is unacceptable.While cases involving men may receive less media attention, that does not diminish their occurrence or significance.
This is not a competition about which gender suffers more; it is about ensuring justice and fairness for all individuals, regardless of gender.
The fact that women can lie and deceive is not only evident from numerous court rulings but is also recognized on an international scale. The Amber Heard case is a glaring example.
Therefore, approaching a one-sided statement from a woman with skepticism is not only logical but firmly grounded in material facts.
