Provivek8043

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Provivek8043
    Participant
      P
      Provivek8043
      PARTICIPANT
      April 26, 2025 at 2:14 pm
      your personal liability for your father’s debts is generally limited to the value of the assets you actually inherit from his estate. Since the debts (over ₹70 Lakhs from the housing loan and guarantees) appear to significantly exceed the value of his assets (primarily the mortgaged house), you have the right to formally renounce or relinquish your entire inheritance. Doing so means you won’t receive any assets, but crucially, you also won’t be responsible for the debts beyond what the estate’s assets can cover. It is vital that you do not take possession of, use, or manage any of his assets (like the house or bank funds) as this could be construed as accepting the inheritance.

      in reply to: My tau ji fraudulently aquire grandfather’s land #9046
      Provivek8043
      Participant
        P
        Provivek8043
        PARTICIPANT
        April 24, 2025 at 9:38 am
        It’s good that the online Khasra/Khatoni still shows your grandfather’s name and that your relatives have already filed an objection (‘Aapti’). However, it’s crucial to physically verify the latest records at the Tehsil office tomorrow, as online data can sometimes lag, and confirm the exact status of this ‘Aapti’ and whether any mutation application based on the alleged fraudulent deed in favour of your Tau ji’s wife has been filed or stayed due to the objection. Coordinate closely with the brothers and your mother who filed the ‘Aapti’. While this objection is important for the revenue records, remember that consulting a property lawyer and filing a civil suit to formally challenge and seek cancellation of the underlying fraudulent transfer deed itself remains essential for a permanent legal resolution.

        in reply to: My tau ji fraudulently aquire grandfather’s land #9044
        Provivek8043
        Participant
          P
          Provivek8043
          PARTICIPANT
          April 24, 2025 at 9:27 am
          Since you suspect fraud, undue influence, or forgery given the timing and conflicting explanations, the transfer deed can be challenged in a civil court in Uttar Pradesh. Your first crucial step is to hire a competent local lawyer specializing in property law who can help you obtain certified copies of the transfer deed registered in your Tau ji’s wife’s name and the latest land records (Khatauni/Khasra). The primary legal course would be to file a civil suit seeking cancellation of this fraudulent deed and declaration of your share, possibly coupled with a suit for partition of the ancestral property among all legal heirs. Gathering any evidence regarding your grandfather’s health condition at the time, witness accounts (if available), and documenting your Tau ji’s contradictory statements will be important for strengthening your case.

          in reply to: Parking space allotted is less. Any legal course? #9049
          Provivek8043
          Participant
            P
            Provivek8043
            PARTICIPANT
            April 24, 2025 at 8:48 am
            Given that your agreement vaguely promises “a parking space” without specifying dimensions, the situation is challenging but potentially actionable. First, check Bangalore’s municipal building bylaws or the approved building plan (if accessible) for standard minimum parking space dimensions, as developers are typically required to adhere to these norms. Document the inadequacy of the allotted space with photos/videos, and gather any brochures, emails, or plans from the developer that might have implicitly suggested a standard or usable parking size. Since other owners received better spaces, consider discussing this collectively. If negotiation with the developer fails, your primary legal recourse would be to file a complaint either with the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) for failure to provide the promised amenity in a usable standard form or potentially misleading representation, or with the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Consumer Court) alleging deficiency in service due to the unusable nature of the allotted parking space. While the contract’s vagueness is an issue, RERA and consumer courts often consider standard practices, bylaws, and the principle of reasonableness when assessing such disputes.

            in reply to: Accident with Police Vehicle. Please help. #9185
            Provivek8043
            Participant
              P
              Provivek8043
              PARTICIPANT
              April 24, 2025 at 7:52 am
              Go to the nearest police station *yourself* and file a formal report (an FIR or at least a General Diary entry) detailing exactly what happened – that the Alto hit you first, causing you to collide with the police vehicle, and then fled the scene (a hit-and-run). This officially records your version of events. Do not pay any money directly to the police for repairs, as this is improper procedure and could imply guilt; any claims must go through official channels and insurance. Contrary to what they might have said, government vehicles, including police vehicles, are required by law to have at least third-party insurance. Inform your own bike insurance company about the accident immediately, providing details from your police report.

              Provivek8043
              Participant
                P
                Provivek8043
                PARTICIPANT
                April 24, 2025 at 7:46 am
                Employment verification typically confirms objective facts like your tenure and designation, which is separate from a disputed financial claim that should ideally be addressed through discussions or the final settlement process. You should communicate with HR in writing, state that linking factual verification to disputed dues is improper, request the verification needed, and express willingness to resolve the dues issue separately; if they persist, consulting a labor lawyer is advisable as withholding basic verification could be seen as undue pressure and potentially hinder your future employment prospects.

                Provivek8043
                Participant
                  P
                  Provivek8043
                  PARTICIPANT
                  April 24, 2025 at 7:18 am
                  Since you have proof of the reversal via NEFT, including the sender’s PAN and Aadhaar details used for the NEFT, along with the transaction confirmation, you should formally complain to your bank again in writing like email or letter attaching all this evidence and detailing the entire sequence, including your initial contact with the bank and the sender’s request. Clearly state that the funds were returned and the lien is erroneous. If the bank branch remains unhelpful or insists on the sender withdrawing the complaint. Escalate the matter through the bank’s official grievance redressal mechanism like the nodal officer and, if unresolved within 30 days, file a complaint with the Banking Ombudsman, presenting all your documentation as proof that the disputed amount was already returned to the original sender.

                  in reply to: Politician wants to buy our land for low price #30786
                  Provivek8043
                  Participant
                    P
                    Provivek8043
                    PARTICIPANT
                    March 21, 2025 at 3:26 pm
                    This is a tough situation, but you do have options. If you file a **tenant eviction case**, it could take years, but courts do rule in favor of landlords when tenants stop paying rent. You can also explore a **police complaint for illegal occupation**, which might put pressure on them. If legal proceedings seem too slow, consider **negotiating a better deal** with the politician—maybe not full market price, but higher than their current lowball offer. Also, if there’s any local media or political opposition, highlighting the situation might create some pressure. If you decide to sell, ensure everything is documented legally to avoid future disputes. Stay strong and don’t let them bully you into a bad deal!

                    Provivek8043
                    Participant
                      P
                      Provivek8043
                      PARTICIPANT
                      March 21, 2025 at 3:21 pm
                      This seems like a classic intimidation tactic. Legal notice charges are typically borne by the sender, not the recipient. First, check your rental agreement—if there’s no mention of a ₹50k charge for notice issuance, they have no legal basis to demand it. Second, do not pay unless they obtain a court order, which is highly unlikely. Third, you can send them a **reply to the legal notice** denying their claims (via a lawyer) to protect yourself legally. If they keep harassing you, consider filing a complaint with the **consumer forum** for unfair practices. Stay firm, and don’t fall for pressure tactics!

                      Provivek8043
                      Participant
                        P
                        Provivek8043
                        PARTICIPANT
                        March 21, 2025 at 3:19 pm
                        eviction and rent recovery cases in India can take several years, especially if the tenant is using delay tactics and has political connections. Since your lawyer isn’t proactive, you might consider switching to a more aggressive one who can push for **case expedition** under **Order 17 Rule 1 of CPC** and object to unnecessary adjournments. If the court rules in your favor, you can recover dues through **execution proceedings**, where the court can attach the tenant’s assets or salary. However, actual recovery depends on enforcement—if the tenant has no attachable assets, it may be difficult. If things are dragging too long, you might explore alternative dispute resolution (ADR) like mediation. Consider consulting a property dispute specialist who can navigate this better. Stay persistent, and don’t hesitate to escalate matters if needed.

                        Provivek8043
                        Participant
                          P
                          Provivek8043
                          PARTICIPANT
                          March 3, 2025 at 8:23 pm
                          your grandfather chose *you* for a reason, and legally, that land is yours. Since he self-acquired the property and transferred it to you (even as a minor), your uncles have no right to demand “fair shares”—transfers to grandchildren are protected under Benami laws, and their threats hold no merit if you act now. Gather every document (sale deeds, tax receipts) and consult a lawyer in Chhattisgarh to send a stern legal notice warning them to back off; if they persist, file a police complaint for harassment or seek a restraining order. As for the gold/stocks they withheld, you can still claim your share (the 12-year window hasn’t closed!), so push for a partition suit—don’t let guilt or family pressure silence you. Hire a local property manager to safeguard the land remotely, and remember: you’re not being selfish, you’re honoring your grandfather’s wishes. Stay strong, document every threat, and lean on trusted friends and family.

                        Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)