Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 5, 2025 at 4:03 pm in reply to: Changing to an inferior job after divorce is initiated in order to reduce Alimony #2009RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
May 5, 2025 at 4:03 pmNow you have contradicted yourself. If wife earns 8 lpa and husband 32 lpa, wife will get maintenance, which is OP’s case and most common case in India. Wife earning same as husband is rare in india.May 5, 2025 at 3:39 pm in reply to: Changing to an inferior job after divorce is initiated in order to reduce Alimony #2004RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
May 5, 2025 at 3:39 pmYuzi’s wife dhanshree also got it. So each and every working woman will get it.May 5, 2025 at 3:33 pm in reply to: Changing to an inferior job after divorce is initiated in order to reduce Alimony #1994RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
May 5, 2025 at 3:33 pm1. Op’s wife is earning 8 LPA and I have read a lot about alimony and maintenance in India. I’m not a lawyer, but most definitely she will get 1/4 of his salary as maintenance. It’s not only for housewives.2. A woman is not liable for alimony only when she is living with her BF. It’s not applicable if both live separately.
May 5, 2025 at 2:25 pm in reply to: Changing to an inferior job after divorce is initiated in order to reduce Alimony #1979RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
May 5, 2025 at 2:25 pmFirst of all, women are not our own half. They’re full and complete humans, who are well educated and can earn on their own. Aren’t they all strong independent women? Kahan gaya sara femin ism? If they have the freedom to do whatever they want, they should have the freedom to earn on their own.Who says he didn’t treat her well? Women can cheat as well. (And do many other bad things like harassing husband, his parents etc.) And our screwed up Indian law requires giving 1/4th salary to cheater woman as well. This is what MRA like me are against.
There’s no concept of secure insecure in law. Law defines a husband as an ATM machine while a woman as a Schrodinger’s femnist who is simultaneously strong independent and weak dependant. While she earns, she enjoys free money from her ATM , I.e. husband.
April 12, 2025 at 2:04 pm in reply to: Tata Elxsi won case against employee who quit before 18months bond period. #16550RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
April 12, 2025 at 2:04 pmThis is why it’s important to fight for strong labour laws with st broseph. We had 2 tiny dharnas for labour laws in IT in Bangalore. Until we fight for it, we won’t get it.RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
April 4, 2025 at 1:22 amNamaz can be done anywhere. Doesn’t have to be in a mosque. Mosques are not sacred religious places. They’re just a place to gather.RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
April 3, 2025 at 5:11 pmNope. As per Islam, religious properties like mosques do not hold the same importance as Hindu religious sites. Mosques can be made anywhere. They’re regularly demolished and replaced in Arab counties. Waqf is just a land grabbing mafia.RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
April 3, 2025 at 4:12 pmI’m a Hindu. Why would they remove me?RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
April 3, 2025 at 4:11 pmYeah, how about US UK Canada Australia Europe etc? They also don’t have this waqfRRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
April 3, 2025 at 11:19 amThis law doesn’t exist in most Muslim countries like Pakistan, afghanistan, Indonesia, Malaysia or Arab countries. There’s no reason for it in India as well.But govt is too weak to remove it. BJP would need 2/3 majority before getting enough courage to remove it.
RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
March 28, 2025 at 4:52 pmI work in software. Most software is based on Indian and international laws which require this rounding. But as usual, it’s not enforced in India.RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
March 28, 2025 at 4:31 pmIt exists.March 1, 2025 at 3:58 am in reply to: I don’t see a culture of Suing the company or a public administration department in India. Why is that? #45036RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
March 1, 2025 at 3:58 amHe’s 100% right that you’ll get keeled.RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
February 7, 2025 at 4:41 pmYou can’t upload videos with personal info on the internet. Perhaps you can blur their faces, but in that case, idk what you’ll achieve by doing so.I’m saying based on what I’ve read about laws.
RRuchikaseeker505
PARTICIPANT
February 7, 2025 at 2:40 pmNAL. Answering based on what I know.1. Yes. It’s legal to record anything in public.
2. Yes. It’s allowed as evidence.
3. No, you can’t upload it to social media. It’s illegal.
-
AuthorPosts