Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
UNAL
rule book: a book of rules. In this case, maybe constitution. assuming article 19 is an article in constitution.UBecause it is not clear to the judges what morals or decency means, so when the case requires they consult the rule book.UDisclamer NAL.You raise a concerning point. [https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gang-rape-of-up-man-highlights-need-for-section-377-in-bns-bill/article68320575.ece](https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gang-rape-of-up-man-highlights-need-for-section-377-in-bns-bill/article68320575.ece) As Veigtable_Database78 pointed out, ipc 377 has rape of a man, but bns doesnt have. While bns seems to have
[https://www.ibanet.org/new-criminal-laws-legalise-male-rape-in-India](https://www.ibanet.org/new-criminal-laws-legalise-male-rape-in-India)
#2: Equal rights for victims: Section 200[^([6])](https://www.ibanet.org/new-criminal-laws-legalise-male-rape-in-India#_edn6): Rights of victims requires that all victims receive equal consideration and respect from the government regardless of their sex.
it doesn’t define rape in a gender neutral way
`”On the other hand, the Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita has completely removed the provisions under Section 377, which means that the protection of men against rape has been removed in the new Act. The offence of ‘rape’ is covered under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which does not provide any protection to a male against sexual assault.”`
Ui am NAL. Sir/Mam, please explain.no punishment for addicts? reminds me of stalin. one death is a tragedy, million is a statistic. once is a crime, multiple times is fine?
UI am trying to research downvote mechanics. any idea why you got downvoted? sarcasm is a crime now?UDemocracy is better than dictatorship because a fool with ultimate power wont wreak tyranny on the masses……ohh wait, we are a democracy, and now we dont know who to punish for thisUThis brings up another interesting point. If i wanted to find out the actual numbers (in this regard or any other regard, like say insurance payouts, insurance scams, husband suicides, wife suicides, kidneys stolen from homeless people etc), how would I? RTI only gives the (fallible) testimony of a concerned (fallible) authority. The difference between science (pursuit of truth) and superstition (a respectable person said this) must be made.UPrevention is better than cure.If divorces go to court (i know about mutual divorce) then shouldn’t there be a marriage court? both would-be spouses have to prove to the judge that they want to and can live together for extended periods of time? And when divorce/separation happens, and monetary settlement is mandated by court, the marriage granting judge should pay part of the alimony/maintenance.
