Forum Replies Created
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
-
Posts
-
UHello yes please feel free to call me on 9872959566. Please avoid call between 10 Am to 4 pm on a working day.UHello you are welcome !
See, before your husband gets visitation rights, move aboard and go outside the jurisdiction of Indian courts. And yes, your husband may initiate divorce on mental cruelty grounds. And no judge can compel a spouse to live with another. This is settled law in India. And such cases once contested go on for decades in India, most of such cases are compromised after years of litigation.
So there is no time line, earlier the better sense prevails in parties.UHello ! Well, such oppression of women after marriage is increasing every day. But given the background of facts and I am a lawyer for 14 years and have been canvassing the cause of people in High Court at Chandigarh. In my considered opinion, yes, you have custody of your child till 5 years. Since under Indian Law, mother is natural guardian till child turns 5. Thereafter, father may seek visitation rights.
Hope I have answered your queryUWell, yes ! But if caught by the other side, it would expedite the result of divorce proceedings 😄UWould love to ! See, I did not say we only have tough but I defended my stance. I may be good bad worse in defending my stand but yes, I said what I felt existsUWell, I was not attempting to defend my fraternity, but now I will dispel the doubt you have.
1- on the issue of midnight court hearings: there are several issue of national interest and thus, upon a request from the lawyers the Chief Justice orders of such hearing. The issues of common man, are issues between two individuals and they will keep agitating. Because one party is never satisfied and they have been litigating in 3-4 courts of appeal, so if there is one more jurisdiction beyond the SC they will flood that as well with litigation.
2- issue of summer vacations: if you have a lawyer or a judge in your family then please spend a day with him, the fraternity works 24/7. Where as, the “govt offices” you meant do not carry their work home and enjoy so many leaves in different form. If judges won’t take break they will go mad hearing issues. Imagine you can’t handle one issue of your life and you get agitated dealing with it everyday. Whereas, a judge has to hear 100 such issues every day and they deliver justice. Else, we will be questioned by a key board warrior like you.UDon’t want to be a key board warrior brother. But we need to look within. The judges are product of our society. We need to question ourselves first.UWell, it has become a fashion to insult the institution. We need to introspect. There may be a very minor percentage of judges who are black sheep and indulges into unethical gain. But everyday, justice is delivered. I am a lawyer myself and having 14 years of experience to back myself and to say that, majority are still ethical.And yes, I being a first generation lawyer, I agree with you that kith and kin of judges should not be elevated to the bench. And lately, even two senior most judges in SC are also holding the same opinion and have written to the chief to recommend the name of lawyers for elevation to the bench who are 1st generation lawyers.
So hopefully, fingers crossed, things will change and are changing. Our infrastructure in court has gone up many miles in the tenure of last CJ.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)