[User_6815da47]

U

User_6815da47
PARTICIPANT
May 7, 2026 at 9:52 am

If the accounts were genuine created with genuine information you are fine. If you used fake information to create accounts you could be held as an accessory. But action could be remote. Aa

Share

[User_6815da47]

U

User_6815da47
PARTICIPANT
May 7, 2026 at 2:08 am

That is unethical, you can try claiming overtime based on 16 hours logged.

Share

[User_6815da47]

U

User_6815da47
PARTICIPANT
May 7, 2026 at 1:20 am

You can keep it, there is no harm and use it for some petty agreement.

Share

[User_6815da47]

U

User_6815da47
PARTICIPANT
February 3, 2025 at 9:18 am

Depends on whether there is a state law requiring you to return token amount, Kerala has. If the state has such a law you will need to show injury and loss of money. Otherwise you can keep the money, that is the purpose of token to hedge against the risk from opportunity cost.

Share

[User_6815da47]

U

User_6815da47
PARTICIPANT
February 1, 2025 at 2:15 pm

If it is not a legal case, notice from court no need to respond. Looks like a lawyer’s notice which is mainly for intimidation. I don’t think it will amount to anything, you can just ignore it. Proper way for your uncle and aunt was to make a application with property registry/court and they will issue you a notice seeking your non-objection. If you do not respond they may take its as no objection and give property to your uncle and aunt. This may wary from state to state.

Since you do not want to make a claim, there is no need to respond to any mail or notice.

Share

[Author]

Posts