Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
ABecause the law allows him to ? But OP has a long legal battle and heavy burden of proof if he chooses this route. It is going to come down to the evidence the two parties present, but if it is inconclusive, the legal status quo would generally prevail.ABeing a tenant would show the possession started with the permission of the owner. I am not sure whether the claim of stopping rent payment will in itself be enough to establish adverse possession. Some factors that may help the OP:
Major repairs, renovation or construction was carried out and paid for by OP’s family without any involvement of the person claiming to be heir
OP’s neighbours give affidavits saying that as far as they know the property has been owned by OP’s family
Some govt records showing OP’s family as being in de facto control of the property
APlease be aware that the concept of adverse possession is nuanced. Mere possession of property is not enough . It must also be well known and adversarial to the interest of the legal owner. The fact that the lady herself allowed your grandfather to stay and the bills are still in her name will not be helpful to your case. You essentially have to show you publicly treated the property as being owned by you and the legal owner accepted that and did nothing to dispossess you for 12 years or more.Gather all the documents you have and discuss with a lawyer in person.
AThe question is who is going to pay the third party builder ? What incentive will he have to complete the construction since you have already paid the full amount to the last guy who is now absconding.Did you try to get the order against the builder executed ? Have you approached the High Court ?
If nothing else works, you might have to approach the NCLT to get the matter resolved through insolvency to recover your money.
What about the owners of the other flats ? Try to organise them together so that you can share legal fees.
AThere It is a grey area and a lot may depend on local laws and guidelines. Reasonable restrictions can certainly be placed on where pets are allowed- for example, in swimming pools, gyms, restaurants, kids’ playing areas, etc.Pets don’t enjoy any specific legal rights under the Constitution or any Act of Parliament. The PCA Act, 1960, lays down laws for preventing cruelty to animals but doesn’t give them rights to access all areas and spaces accessible to human beings. AWBI has specific guidelines for dogs, but these are just guidelines , not laws that are enforceable by themselves.
Courts have taken a mixed and balanced view. While they have supported rights of pet owners, they have also upheld the right of RWAs to place reasonable restrictions in the interest of safety and hygiene.
In general, while RWAs can place restrictions, they must be reasonable and not arbitrary or descriminatory. At the same time, the rights or pet owners are not absolute and they cannot infringe on the rights of other residents – especially in common spaces.
AThe best option is to try to settle with the company. Whether they will agree depends on many factors, including:Nature of data deleted
Damage to the company
Relationship with managers and nature of departure
Who the employer is – if it is a big MNC or large Indian company, they most probably won’t show any flexibilityAIf you do not pay them, the insurance company will probably file an execution petition against you, likely in the same High Court, to recover the amount from you. The court will then send you notice for recovery.If you think you have a strong case, you can appeal. If the decision was by a single judge, you may appeal to a Division Bench, if the High Court has a provision, and then file a SLP before the Supreme Court. There is no automatic right to be heard by the Supreme Court in all matters. They may decide not to hear your case based on the SLP you file.
Please discuss the detailed court order with a lawyer in person when it becomes available.
AI doubt the department that issued them would have preserved files from the 1950s. Even if you could find it, what purpose would it serve ? Are the parties involved still alive ? Date of limitation for any legal action would have long passed.AI don’t know much about India’s immigration law, but she can contact UNHCR’s India office if she wants help getting asylum.AHave you filed a complaint with the RERA ? Such cases generally proceed much faster there than in the traditional judicial forums. I know of people who received compensation for delay from the builder within 2 years of filing the case. The whole process is online and even hiring a lawyer for representation is not required.AYou have written a very lengthy post that hasn’t answered the question about what actually happened. I gather from some other posters who dug through your linkedin posts that you had a confrontation with your manager and got fired.Since I don’t know both sides of the story, I can’t really comment on the merits of the case. However, I can definitely say you are communicating very poorly and not getting your point of view across,.based on both of your posts that I have read.
Please try to be more precise, concise and respectful of the readers’ time. You cannot assume that a person reading your post is aware of everything that has been going on in your life. I understand you may be in a disturbed state of mind, but you are not doing yourself any favour by posting what most people would consider to be wild rants.
