Ayushiguy38

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Ayushiguy38
    Participant
      A
      Ayushiguy38
      PARTICIPANT
      May 6, 2026 at 8:39 pm
      >Β Is that correct?

      yes

      1. 6-10 months max. No, the advocate will handle it.
      2. In Delhi, I’d charge 75,000 to 1,00,000 for a case like this. Don’t know the norm in Kolkata. Being said, fees differ wildly from lawyer to lawyer. Shop for a lawyer within your budget.

      Ayushiguy38
      Participant
        A
        Ayushiguy38
        PARTICIPANT
        May 6, 2026 at 7:58 pm
        depends on the facts of the case.

        yes, it does come with travel issues.

        also, why aren’t you getting his FIR quashed?

        Ayushiguy38
        Participant
          A
          Ayushiguy38
          PARTICIPANT
          May 6, 2026 at 7:46 pm
          luck hai boss.

          Ayushiguy38
          Participant
            A
            Ayushiguy38
            PARTICIPANT
            May 6, 2026 at 7:45 pm
            1. no. you did the right thing.
            2. I practise in delhi. I don’t know how things work in kolkata. I take a one time fee to handle the case from start to finish. Extra if the case drags too long or if there are other expenses. Some lawyers do charge a conferencing fee. I don’t. Every lawyer has his own method of charging clients.
            3. ask your advocate to file an application pointing out the urgency.
            4. yeah. pushing for a no money settlement at this stage makes zero sense.
            5. FIRs once filed need to be quashed. A case for quashing will be filed before the HC. You’ll have to hire an advocate who appears there. Your lawyer, and the opposite party’s lawyer will make a joint submission stating that the parties have entered into a compromise. Again, I don’t know how much it costs in Kolkata, but in Delhi, I charge 75,000 to 1,00,000 for a 482 application.

            Ayushiguy38
            Participant
              A
              Ayushiguy38
              PARTICIPANT
              May 6, 2026 at 7:34 pm
              no. the same advocate will do.

              Ayushiguy38
              Participant
                A
                Ayushiguy38
                PARTICIPANT
                May 6, 2026 at 7:30 pm
                highly unlikely. You’d have to royally mess up to get jail time here.

                just do what the court says. stay in their good graces.

                Ayushiguy38
                Participant
                  A
                  Ayushiguy38
                  PARTICIPANT
                  May 6, 2026 at 7:27 pm
                  3 years ago when I used to appear before the trial court, I used to charge atleast 45,000 for handling such cases from start to finish. For one single appearance, I’d charge atleast 15,000. Litigation is expensive, friend. That is why no one likes to get into it.

                  you’re better of if you just pay the 2500.

                  that being said, no warrant will be issued just yet even if you miss the first date. Agli date pe make some excuses and apologise. You’ll be scolded at most. Baaki it is up to you

                  Ayushiguy38
                  Participant
                    A
                    Ayushiguy38
                    PARTICIPANT
                    May 6, 2026 at 7:23 pm
                    I’ll answer your questions categorically:

                    * no.
                    * yes.
                    * yes.
                    * fine. no jail time.
                    * hire an advocate.

                    Ayushiguy38
                    Participant
                      A
                      Ayushiguy38
                      PARTICIPANT
                      May 6, 2026 at 7:19 pm
                      >β‚Ή2500?

                      only 2500? bas? lol

                      take his help dude.

                      in reply to: Marriage of Convenience Pre-Nup #2601
                      Ayushiguy38
                      Participant
                        A
                        Ayushiguy38
                        PARTICIPANT
                        May 4, 2025 at 6:11 pm
                        idc

                        **——————————————————————————————-**

                        **Disclaimer: The information provided above does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available are strictly for general informational purposes only and create no liability on the provider of said information. Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.**

                        in reply to: Marriage of Convenience Pre-Nup #2592
                        Ayushiguy38
                        Participant
                          A
                          Ayushiguy38
                          PARTICIPANT
                          May 4, 2025 at 5:38 pm
                          Supreme Court advocate here:

                          No.

                          **————————————————————————————————-**

                          **Disclaimer: The information provided above does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available are strictly for general informational purposes only and create no liability on the provider of said information. Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.**

                          in reply to: Can we legally seprate from our parents #4343
                          Ayushiguy38
                          Participant
                            A
                            Ayushiguy38
                            PARTICIPANT
                            May 4, 2025 at 5:29 pm
                            Yes. But that is also exactly why I added a second para which has advice more tailor made to suit the OP.

                            **——————————————————————————————-**

                            **Disclaimer: The information provided above does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available are strictly for general informational purposes only and create no liability on the provider of said information. Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.**

                            in reply to: Taking LLB degree #2891
                            Ayushiguy38
                            Participant
                              A
                              Ayushiguy38
                              PARTICIPANT
                              May 4, 2025 at 7:58 am
                              Supreme Court advocate here:

                              1. Yes.
                              2. Yes.

                              **—————————————————————————————————**

                              **Disclaimer: The information provided above does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available are strictly for general informational purposes only and create no liability on the provider of said information. Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.**

                              Ayushiguy38
                              Participant
                                A
                                Ayushiguy38
                                PARTICIPANT
                                May 4, 2025 at 6:49 am
                                Supreme Court advocate here:

                                First of all, I will put a *bona fide* disclaimer here stating that suicide is not an option. Stay safe.

                                I’ll answer these questions in seratim:

                                1. The family is not legally obligated to repay them out of their own pocket. But if said member receives any money from the estate of the deceased, the creditor can seek repayment through said estate. For eg. A owes X a sum of 15 lakhs, and passes away. B, the son of A, receives 5 lakhs from the estate of A. X can now legally seek repayment of 5 lakhs from B on account of the 5 lakhs he inherited from A, but not of the remaining 10 lakhs.
                                2. No. They can surely file a case, but the case will not go anywhere. Notwithstanding, harassing the kin of the debtor is a common tactic that is used by unscrupulous bankers (which is also illegal).
                                3. Not really. Borrowing from the earlier example, if A leaves a will for B and leaves all his money to B via the will, the testator is obligated to pay off A’s debts to X first and then disburse the remaining assets.
                                4. In this case, the heirs are not liable to pay anything.

                                The golden rule that needs to be followed here is straightforward: a creditor is liable to take money solely from the debtor and from the debtor’s estate. If the debtor dies, the creditor may take money from the legal heirs to the extent where repayment of said debt is sought only from the estate that the heirs may have inherited and not from the heirs’ own assets/estate.

                                **—————————————————————————————————**

                                **Disclaimer: The information provided above does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available are strictly for general informational purposes only and create no liability on the provider of said information. Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.**

                                in reply to: What if I hit ambushers with car? #3752
                                Ayushiguy38
                                Participant
                                  A
                                  Ayushiguy38
                                  PARTICIPANT
                                  May 2, 2025 at 5:12 pm
                                  Supreme Court advocate here:

                                  you have the right to defend yourself in case any such situation arises. However, due to how deeply our courts are conditioned against the ‘badi gadi’ in any vehicular accident case, proving that you were only protecting yourself is a tedious matter (note, not impossible), even if you have dashcam footage.

                                  However, my sincere advice to you is that if a situation like this ever arises, floor the gas pedal and worry about the consequences later. I’d rather deal with such a case as an accused rather than as a victim.

                                  **—————————————————————————————————**

                                  **Disclaimer: The information provided above does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available are strictly for general informational purposes only and create no liability on the provider of said information. Readers should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.**

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)