Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
IOkay so the way I understand it,
Land owner does some deal(verbal, transactional or whatever) with property owner and the property owner builds stuff on the land.
Now if any change needs to happen, land owner and property owner make a deal again. If they are in agreement good, if conflict arise they end up in court to get it settled. Right? Like here in OP’s case.
ISide posting to OP here:How does the law work for this? Land owned by person A but property on that land by person B.
IIt’s true. You can either put years behind getting this guy face hardships for what he did. Or you can get rid of him and move on.Right now it is natural to feel that he must pay for what he did. And it always will feel that way, but going into a case like this, will not only halt your life but will become a drag on it.
IYeah that’s something i wonder too. Because, if we are talking about having sex. The courts are pretty regressive on this.Like when it’s about being the biological father of the child or not. The court accepts no dna test. The only thing they’ll accept is that during the time period child was conceived, the husband has to be geographically away from the wife. If they lived together or there was a possibility that they could had met then the court will go with the opinion they had sex and the child is his.
I>I didn’t condemn opNot calling you out specifically. Just people in general who say if you have so many trust issues then don’t marry.
>Btw worst case is she kills you and plans to live off of your money with her lover. Hone ko to kuch bhi ho sakta.
True that 😐😐
>My motto is go in with good faith after knowing the person as much as possible. Otherwise such insecurity will act as self fulfilling prophecy.
Again, you’re right about the fact that you can’t have a marriage if you don’t trust your partner. But that also doesn’t mean you go in there without setting up proper measures.
My approach would be take whatever steps you think are needed for those scenarios. And then work towards building your marriage. If things go south, you know you have placed a safety net.
I>Both are not the same.I am aware my examples aren’t the best to draw a proper analogy. Because like you said, there’s night and day difference between them.
>You go through manier steps to insure whoever you are marrying is the right person.
Yes right. You do, but none of them are full proof, are they? So why condemn someone if they are looking out for themselves. That’s all I’m trying to say. It’s not about trust. It’s about preparing for the worst case.
INot everytime it is a stranger directly attacking you. Often times someone familiarizes with you with a friendly face, acting as a fellow traveller.Your maid can pretend to be a do gooder as long as she needs, waiting for the right opportunity to rob you. Your colleagues/friends to backstab you.
My point is you can’t know the real intention of someone. And many a times, marriages start our good but when things fall apart, people become vultures.
IOfcourse. There was a case recently, where an adult female 36yo, mother of 3 children, eloped with a minor boy.You’d expect since it’s a minor, she’ll face strict punishment under pocso. But no! She’s a female. They only charged her with kidnapping and bail was granted immediately.
IBy that logic, women should also not go out with pepper sprays.In your own words: Why go out if you gave so little trust?
I> appreciate really good.Can you tell me more about this. I can’t understand why a bag would go up in value. Do they make limited quantity of each design or something?
