Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
KThe person he scams takes the friend down with him. The police with extort money out of the said friend and harass him.KIt is a cruel world, to survive always keep yourself above others. If it’s his wish, leave him like that, you tried that’s it.KTrust me the police have way more important things they have to do than investigate you. (Not like they even DO the important stuff but whatever)KNAL In my opinion you should grant a paid leave of 2 weeks to that teacher and tell the parents that y’all terminated her and then rusticate their kid 🥳KI saw the same situation and the OP went to the parents of the friend who took the money and explained to them the entire issue.
You can do the same and add emotional factors that you need the money for family/medical emergencies etc.KBuying tickets in black itself is illegal how can you take legal action against the seller then. It’s like saying I wanted pot, it’s illegal but I paid the guy for it but he ran away.KIf you’re going to copy paste from chatgpt hoping to rake in upvotes for your advice pls put NAL in the beginning of your commentKGathering the videos and photos of the destruction should be evidence enough. You can head to the police station to file an fir with that evidence but still due NAL so get more people’s opinion on thisKNAL but a septic tank should be within the bounds of private properties. He can be fined for damage for public property, obstruction of traffic etc I mean as soon as they start digging the road you can call the cops on them. Any lawyer here please correct me if I may be wrongK>googled any random cheque and filled the documentsI stopped reading this post after this. Blatantly your fault. NAL
KNAL
1. Public space ≠ Free-for-allJust because someone is in a public space does not mean their body is public property. The law distinguishes between general public recordings (like filming a concert, rally, or tourist spot) and intrusive, sexually motivated or non-consensual recordings.
—
2. Sections from the IPC that apply:
IPC Section 354C (Voyeurism):
> “Whoever watches, or captures the image of a woman engaging in a private act, in circumstances where she would usually have the expectation of not being observed…”
This includes acts done without consent, even in public if the focus is on intimate parts (breasts, buttocks, thighs, etc.).
IPC Section 509:
> “Words, gestures or acts intended to insult the modesty of a woman.”
Secretly clicking photos with sexual intent can fall under this.
IT Act Section 66E (Violation of privacy):
> Capturing, publishing or transmitting the image of a private area of any person without their consent, under circumstances violating their privacy.
“Private area” is interpreted contextually — and a bikini-clad woman at a beach doesn’t give automatic permission to record her chest or butt.
—
When Is It Illegal?
Recording is illegal in public if:
The subject is a woman and the focus is on her breasts, buttocks, thighs, feet etc. with a sexual undertone.
The image/video is taken without consent and later shared/published, especially online.
The person objects, and the recorder continues.
It causes mental distress, embarrassment, or violation of dignity.
The person is being targeted, followed, or stalked.
There’s an intent to sexualize (even subtly) or dehumanize.
—
“But I was filming the building…”
This is a classic excuse, but intent and context matter. If someone zooms in on a woman’s chest or butt while pretending to record a building or sunset, and especially if that footage is later used/shared sexually — it’s clearly harassment and potentially criminal.
—
So where’s the line?
Consent + Intent + Context are key.
Filming public events or people as part of a crowd is usually fine.
Targeting someone’s body, especially private parts, even in public, without consent, is a violation.
Sharing such content online further worsens the offense.
KJust how long the commissioner could delay it, keep filing rti and he’ll do it eventually by getting fed up
