Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
VFirstly, he was a technician or an operator and not a doctor. Secondly, you were taken advantage of. His job is to verbally instruct you on what to do. Report him or he’ll keep doing it to others, including minors.VYou’re still confidently blurting out completely wrong info. Namaz HAS to be performed in masjid AND with the other people. It’s called jamaat. A Muslim is strictly frowned upon if he prays at home instead of masjid. You can ONLY pray at another place if you don’t have access to a masjid for one reason or other.VAnd I have replied to one of them. Go check it out. If you can’t find it, ask, and you shall be bestowed with it.VIt’s cute when people try to educate me on my own religion and history and pull facts out of thin air with such confidence “Nope, you’re wrong and I’m right even though I haven’t set a foot in a madrasa or read a single book on Islam.”
Obviously, mosques don’t hold the same value as temples for Hindus. Just like temples don’t hold the same values to Muslims. Just like neither of these hols the same value to atheists.
The simple fact that you people don’t understand is that it isn’t about architecture or anything else, it’s simply that no one person owns these sites. As soon as someone donates, say, 100 acres of his land to be waqf’d for the use of Muslims, he can’t take it back, its owners become the while Muslim community and it can’t be used for any other purpose than those that are for the benefit of the community, like mosques, graveyards, eidgah, schools, madrasas, gardens, wells, et cetera. And their use is supposed to be free. That’s what Waqf is. The building can be demolished and made anew if needed, but a Muslim can’t demolish a mosque and build a restaurant on that land.
VEven the politicians who’ve brought the bill don’t make such an ignorant claim. But I’ll give you the chance to elaborate on how that happens and share references and proofs. And I’ll share proofs of how the Board does exactly the opposite of that by illegally selling Waqf property.VBecause Muslims had no role in the independence of these countries, Muslims had no religious properties in these countries where the masjid built in these countries are as new as only a couple decades old.Contrary to that, Muslims have had very long presence In India. They ruled over most of India and donated their lands and built hundreds of thousands of religious properties in India, they initiated the resistance against the British, they sacrificed themselves in millions on the same grounds they find themselves today: an attack on their identity and property.
Now don’t respond with “You made Pakistan in return of all of that”. We didn’t. Our forefathers opposed it and stayed in India only for one reason: to take care of these religious sites. But the country was still divided because people were tired of killing each other and there was no end to it. It was not because Gandhi willingly gave away half the country, it was because there was no choice left. All that happened because the politicians played that game for their own power. And after all the misery that your and our forefathers went through, we’re back to the same stage, all because it’s easier for politicians to keep us engaged in trivial issues instead of actually working on the development of the country and her people.
VIt doesn’t exist in Muslim countries because it is the responsibility of the Muslim ruler or govt to manage Waqf property, which they do. It was needed in India because it is a secular country with provisional autonomy given to each religious entity to manage their religious affairs as long as they don’t clash with the laws specified in the Constitution. This is analogous to how every individual has a right to manage his household affairs the way he sees fit as long as his actions don’t clash with the laws in the Constitution.VMadrasa curriculum:https://archive.org/details/CurriculumDarseNizami/page/n2/mode/1up
The curriculum is listed starting from page 4.
VBecause we have millions of Muslims in India who donate their money or property for the benefit of others. And those properties cannot be sold once donated because they don’t belong to any person. And that is exactly why govt wants to make changes: to illegally sell these valuable properties and fill their pockets because greed has taken over these non-civilians because the civilians are busy being ignorant and indifferent about these matters and about their rights.VSo you should fight the govt to improve laws related to your religious properties. But instead, Hindus of this country have completely surrendered to this govt and want others to face bullshit laws too.V> He had parked bikes like this before without an issue,
The cops should let him go because his history of parking bikes like this is good.VThis post is the perfect “janhit main jaari” advertisement for not giving your property on rent. If you do, replace tenants in 10 months.
