Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Uthe fake account threats after the bail stay honestly change the situation a lot because now it is not just about the original complaint anymore but also about ongoing intimidation and fear after the case already started. the part that stands out most is that you seem to have repeatedly approached the police while already feeling unsafe and instead felt dismissed or blamed which naturally destroys trust completely. please keep every threatening message screenshot account link and timestamp safely backed up because these later patterns can become very important even if individual accounts get deleted quickly. did you receive any written acknowledgement or diary entry when you reported the new threats and fake account messages or was everything handled informally through calls and station visits onlyUthe worrying part here is not just the delay but the repeated shifting stories around both properties because once someone keeps changing explanations and draft figures over a whole year it naturally starts damaging trust completely. also the fact that no proper registration or final agreement happened despite taking 10 lakhs upfront makes the situation feel much more serious than a normal delayed land deal. good thing is he apparently acknowledged returning the money instead of outright denying liability because that can matter later if you have messages or recordings of it. was the 10 lakh payment done through bank transfer or cash and do you have any written receipt agreement or whatsapp chats clearly linking the payment to this land transactionUasking for a detailed cost breakdown first actually sounds reasonable because once training was done in a batch format companies sometimes quote one combined number without employees really knowing how it was calculated individually. also the fact that you already completed one full year out of the two changes the situation a bit compared to someone leaving immediately after joining. a lot of these disputes end up becoming negotiation matters in practice rather than dramatic court battles especially when employees stay professional and keep communication in writing. did the agreement specifically mention any prorated reduction after partial completion or was the same full amount payable regardless of whether someone left after 2 months or after 1 yearUthis honestly sounds more like a neighbourhood management issue that slowly turned emotional after the puppy died. the difficult part is that once people start taking sides between animal welfare and resident frustration things escalate very quickly even if nobody originally intended harm. from what you described the car incident does not sound intentional but emotions are obviously high now because a puppy died. probably the best thing right now is avoiding arguments about blame and focusing on practical solutions like sterilisation relocation support or coordinated feeding areas before the situation gets uglier. has anyone from the locality actually tried contacting any private ngo or municipal animal birth control team yet or has it mostly just been fights between residents and the girl feeding themUa lot of families get confused at this stage because banks property offices and epf departments sometimes casually use these terms interchangeably even though they serve different purposes practically. the good thing is there seems to be no dispute among heirs here because once family members start disagreeing the process becomes much harder and slower. for many people the first step usually ends up being the legal heir certificate simply because multiple later processes ask for it in some form. the bank side often becomes the most unpredictable part because different branches sometimes ask for different levels of paperwork depending on the amount involved. do you know roughly how large the sbi account balance is because that often changes how strict the bank becomes about succession related documentsUthe worrying part here is that once registration and full disbursement are already completed the seller has very little practical incentive left to vacate quickly unless pressure starts building formally. the earlier document delay from idbi and loan processing probably bought them extra time already so now asking for another month after receiving full payment naturally feels unfair from your side. also brokers often disappear once registration is done because their commission part is already over. what may matter most now is the exact wording in the registered agreement about possession date delay consequences and vacant possession obligations because these disputes usually turn heavily on that language later. did the agreement mention any penalty or compensation clause if possession was delayed beyond the promised timelineUthe repeated payment stories about gst system failure and needing to pay again before refunds is honestly a very common pressure pattern in these scams because once someone has already paid once the scammer keeps creating urgency and confusion to extract more. the good thing here is that you stopped before sending the last 37k and you still have chats recordings bank details and the gst info because many people realise much later with almost no evidence left. right now timing probably matters more than arguing with the seller further. was the gst number actually verified anywhere independently or did you only rely on whatever details he sent directly on whatsapp and instagramUthe repeated undertakings in front of police and still not vacating is probably the part that makes this look more serious than a normal delayed rent dispute. once someone keeps extending dates 8 different times while already having other money related cases it naturally starts looking like a pattern instead of temporary hardship. also the fact that he is alone in the flat changes the practical situation a bit compared to cases involving families with children staying there. honestly you already seem to have done most of the important documentation steps properly which many landlords unfortunately skip early on. has he stopped paying completely from december itself or did he make any partial payments at any stage just to keep buying more timeUthe fact that no agreement was signed probably makes this more of a practical dispute than a clean contractual one especially since you informed him quickly and even removed your belongings immediately. at the same time landlords often treat token amounts as compensation for blocking the property for other tenants even for a short period so that is probably the mindset from his side. the blocking part obviously makes it look worse because now there is no communication at all. do you at least have proof of the token payment and chats showing there was no clear non refundable condition discussed beforehandUafter 2 or 3 years of complete blocking and no response it stops looking like someone just trying to reconnect once and starts feeling more like a pattern he refuses to let go of. the fact that he moved from trying to contact you directly to reaching out to siblings and parents is probably why it now feels invasive instead of just annoying. good thing is you have a long history of no contact because that makes the situation clearer than messy on off communication cases. have your family members been saving screenshots call logs or recordings of these attempts or were most of them just blocking and deleting things till nowUafter 45 years of service this probably feels less like a normal accusation and more like humiliation at the point where he expected dignity and retirement which is why it is hitting so hard emotionally the part that usually matters most now is whether the owner has any actual audit shortage records or is mainly using police pressure and fear because those are very different situations also the pf issue suddenly surfacing changes the picture a lot have you collected salary slips bank entries pf statements or any proof showing he continued working all these years even after pf contributions stopped at 60Ueven if parking there annoyed someone throwing or damaging the bike is a completely different thing and that is probably why this feels so upsetting to you especially when you were already dealing with an emergency situation the part that usually matters most now is whether you can connect the damage to a specific person because otherwise these society disputes quickly become denials and counter allegations later have you checked if any cctv near the gate parking or lift area might have captured who actually pushed the bike over before footage gets overwrittenUthis kind of dispute usually becomes difficult because a lot depends on what was actually documented at the start versus what is being demanded now while vacating especially around painting and maintenance charges the part that tends to matter most later is whether there are move in photos chats or agreement clauses showing the original condition of the house because landlords often rely on tenants not having that record have you checked your rental agreement carefully to see if painting charges or a fixed repainting deduction was mentioned anywhere or is this being raised only verbally nowUthis sounds like the family has moved far beyond normal conflict and into a situation where everyone is constantly adjusting their life around fear of his behaviour the part that usually matters most now is documenting the repeated violence and disturbances because families often avoid action for years hoping things calm down until something serious finally happens also wanting distance without wanting jail is more common than people realise in these situations have any of the physical incidents injuries threats or house disturbances ever been recorded reported or witnessed by neighbours or has the family mostly kept everything internal till nowUthis sounds like the police are mainly trying to formally connect the vehicle ownership with who was actually riding at the time rather than treating you as the main accused directly the part that complicates things a bit is the inactive insurance because once that enters the picture owners naturally start worrying about personal liability and repeated appearances have they officially named you anywhere in the fir itself yet or are they currently only asking for a verification style statement about ownership and your father riding the bike
