Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
IBanks were freezing accounts until 2022, as confirmed based on that.
Even in December 2023, when the RBI “suggested” a ban on crypto before the CBDC studies were announced, Fedetel Bank had placed liens on multiple accounts.ILaw enforcement and the judiciary are underfunded and understaffed, while also being overburdened by the sheer magnitude of the population they have to deal with.
Not to forget the sheer stupidity of some people filing frivolous FIRs and civil suits.ISome old RBI notification from 2018 was cited for the freeze, stating that “all cryptocurrency trading is illegal” when enquired about.
Even today, with 1% TDS on every trade, there is enough ambiguity that legacy banks tend to put random liens, especially with UPI-based transactionsIEven if one does everything on this list, there is still a non-zero chance that your bank might freeze your account for crypto transactions. There is much ignorance about blockchain and crypto, not only among law enforcement but also among bankers.There have been multiple instances where:
1. Most big-time legitimate crypto sellers are identified based on their history, but there have been cases where sellers built up their reputation only to scam people suddenly (this is more or less fixed in Binance but still).
2. When selling USDT or any other crypto, be wary of checking payment details to ensure the crypto account and bank account match.
3. Do not get too hurried in releasing crypto; double-check the payment.
Sometimes scammers just send the message and hurry the user to release the crypto, whilst the user has not received any payment.
4. Always use an authenticator or similar 2FAs to slow down the process, so that you do not end up making a hurried transaction. There is always enough time.Even when the transaction was completed without any incident, the bank put a lien and then froze the account.
ICheck properly if the property is ancestral in nature or not.1. If yes, then as a grandson, you have an interest in the ancestral property, and you can take legal steps to protect your family’s interests.
2. The bank’s claim is limited to the property that was validly mortgaged to them. If your uncle is bequeathed the property and has then mortgaged both floors, they can take over both floors; otherwise, no.
3. If the ground floor was validly mortgaged to the bank before you invested in the room, your claim to the room is subordinate to the bank’s mortgage. There is some wiggle room pending relevant factors.I1. File an FIR for the relevant offences.
2. You could go to the courts to enforce the family agreement; if not, you could file for partition.
3. Once that is done and sorted out, if needed, file for a permanent injunction.INow is the time to depend on yourself and those around you. Do not let her (and her family) draw you into a trap.
If handled well, you can come out of it with zero to little damage, as long as you do not lose your wits.IThis is sadly not a rare occurrence, where the girl is married off for reasons known only to her and her family.
The hope is that she will learn to behave well and adjust post-marriage, but when she does not, the bride’s side—rather than taking accountability and helping the groom—tries to steamroll the groom’s side into accepting unfavourable conditions under the threat of hostile marital laws.All these allegations of being a miser, and questioning your manhood/sexuality, are meant to demoralise you and embarrass you into negotiating a higher compensation.
Yes, the situation is not equal, but it is not so bad that you should consider her offer seriously.
Technically, even a day of marriage affords her the right to maintenance and alimony from you, but there are always mitigating legal and social factors.I recently consulted on a case that was almost exactly like yours, and in the end, the bride’s side agreed to 0 compensation; only the status quo was achieved.
Connect with a good lawyer, and do not waste time. You may also come out with the least damage possible.
IIndian Succession Act 1925 applies to: Christians, Parsis, and Jews communities, addresses Willed and Intestate inheritance).
Hindu Succession Act 1956 applies to: Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs communities, and addresses Intestate inheritance).IGoogle “Nyay Prayas”. It is an organisation that mentors men going through hostile divorces and fake 498A cases.
It has been covered by multiple traditional and non-traditional outlets and is much similar to, if not better than, Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj’s organisation.IBajaj or any Finserv does not automatically add insurance; it is something you, as a user, need to opt into.
You should check your loan agreement to see if it mentions any insurance and what type it might be. You can also contact the Bajaj helpline to inquire.Make sure to do this quickly, as most policies (if any) require timely claims.
ISo, you have de facto separation but not a legal one.
Your house is about ~133.33 yd*2, which is above the cutoff limit of 100 yd*2 for EWS.You may, via an affidavit, attempt to establish:
1. Your father owns 50% of this ~133.33 yd*2 house.
2. Your family unit operates as an economic unit separate from your uncles.
3. You (your family) meet all other EWS criteria.This could reflect favourably.
IBanks would follow the usual steps – internal recovery and then pass it on to TPAs (read up on earlier comments for this).
If recovery via intimidation/harassment fails, and as the amount is high, the bank would likely file a civil suit against your brother in hopes of recovering some part of the money.They could also try to add pressure by adding criminal charges if your brother had approved ECS or had given cheques.
II meant that anticipatory bail would not be useful here if the accused has already presented themselves to the police before obtaining it.II understand that your experiences could differ, and it’s true that police do sometimes behave that way for bribes.However, under the Arunesh Kumar guidelines, it is now almost certain that relatives’ names will be struck from the complaint, and no charges will be filed against them unless there is concrete evidence to support it.
Accusers often name relatives just in case something sticks, which adds pressure, but any halfway decent advocate would be able to get these names removed without requiring official handling.so, requesting a 41A CrPC notice actually adds to the troubles by making it official, not reducing them. The police can then cite it as being on record, which would require it to be removed. Even SCI has mentioned that such matters should, as far as possible, be handled through mediation.
