Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Pas of now the courts consider mothers as the better caregivers for younger children. Thatās just 1 factor so even if letās say itās inaccurate, things would still remain the same as thereās other factors which make mother a better candidate for custody.PThereās many data driven factors which courts consider like statistics, past patterns, psychological factors etc. Most independent studies show that mothers are typically better primary caregivers in a childās early years, unless theyāre unfit or mentally unwell. Maternal care strongly influences emotional security, while fathers often have a greater impact from pre-teen years onward. Custody decisions also factor in risks, and statistics – like how child abuse is more often linked to men. For all of these reasons, usually for kids under 8ā10, custody usually favors mothers.PWell, stats arenāt very far for 1960s when it comes to men. Anyway, courts usually see mothers as nurturer and for several factors it goes to the mothers usually. Especially if itās a girl child. Itās only if husband shows that mother is incapable of taking care or mother says she doesnāt want the child, then it goes to father.P– get an anticipatory bail if you think wife could put fake cases on you, that way you wonāt have to go to jail if she puts those cases
– get hard evidences of her cheating, get hard evidences of all transactions & household expenses if you want to contest the alimony price
– aim to settle it outside of court with 1 time payment for both of your own sakes.P– Wife gets alimony even if she cheats, but canāt fight for a huge alimony. If difference between salary is less & husband proves that all expenses were borne by him, effectively proving that wife will have same lifestyle with less alimony, then alimony can be very less.
– child custody usually goes to mothers (like it should) but if husband proves wife is unfit to take responsibility, then father gets custody & no child support if child stays with father. In cases of cheating, itās easier to put a good narrative.
– based on a bunch of things, the alimony price can be brought down and even further down if itās just settled outside of courtPUnless you donāt register your rent agreement at the local court, itās difficult to take any legal course against the land lord.1. Youāve to give a notice period and only then move out, so the land lord deducting rent is sort off okay. You couldāve discussed this before moving out but leave it.
2. You never have to paint or do anything from your own money, youāve to ask the owner to either deduct it from deposit & just arrange painters to know the exact value.
3. Broker has nothing to do at this point. Only option youāve is, you can squat at the flat till you get your deposit back which is again unnecessary. Never hand over the keys until all dues are cleared
PMoney is mostly gone but file a complaint on cybercrime portal and then reach the nearest police station with the filed complaint and convert it to an FIR.PNot really. With a single online threat without any actions would rarely go to court. If the person continues to harass, has history of violence, then may be it could go to court. POCSO is aggressively in action if itās SA, that too gets vetted extensively.But the maximum available option here is police complaint. Police will basically call that person & ask them to stop harassing.
Like I mentioned earlier – itās not worth it. Maximum itāll do is cater your ego but at the cost of legal fees, running between police, lawyers, court etc.
PVIP section had alcohol smoking etc, it would be illegal for them to let under 21 folks in.Check the booking policy thoroughly. You can file a case in consumer court against zomato and get a refund, may be litigation fees.
About the security or manager, thereās no real outcome of taking legal action against them apart from making you feel big. they can justify it as doing their job. Most of itāll be hearsay with no real evidence. Chats / online quarrel wonāt hold value in court. Youāll suffer more in the legal process, not worth the trouble.
Also ignore all these folks saying put a false POCSO case, courts arenāt as dumb as the people suggesting it. Youāll be struck down when it unravels & can even be penalised for misusing laws.
Edit: I got curious and read the terms & conditions of zomato. theyāre not liable in such cases & venue rules apply. If youāve to file a case, include both zomato & the venue otherwise zomato will redirect & shut down the case quickly. It also mentions that all cases will happen in Mumbai court
https://www.district.in/prateek-kuhad-live-at-quake-arena-mar22-2025/event
PNALFrom a purely legal perspective:
Sister – domestic violence, harassment, abuse. Pretty strong case.
In laws – harassment, abuse. In-laws can build a case if they prove that dogs are hazardous to anyone. Either by proving health concerns, allergies, society bylaws prohibiting dogs, biting or dangerous behavior putting neighbors at risk. And even after multiple discussion sister has intentionally used dogs to harass in laws.
But all-in-all sister has a stronger case. But because it gets complicated with animals etc. The whole thing will trickle down to mediation, counselling.
Easiest way out is to come to a middle ground / mediation. In short, keep in-laws away from dogs. Thereās already so many ways it can be achieved easily.
I donāt see a reason to escalate this legally because itāll just stretch out for minor reasons and eventually end up breaking the marriage. but if sheās being abused physical, pls file a police complaint, if the police isnāt in your favour, only then register an FIR and take the legal route
PIām not a lawyer brother.1. In certain cases (not sure if it applies to you) but for cases like harassment, defamation etc. you were put in a situation where you had to bear litigation fees to prove youāre innocent. So as a remedy, you can claim for that litigation amount from the other party. Check with your lawyer if thereās any chance to include that clause.
2. A marriage can be marked as void upto a year. You donāt get a divorcee tag if marriage is annulled. Considering that itās only been 10 months, you still have that option. Chances of giving alimony is also relatively less compared to alimony in divorce. But I understand divorce case is already filed so you canāt do it anymore.
PNALHeās asking for payment for 2 different cases. Sounds legit.
you can ask for litigation fees while putting up the cases, but not sure if itāll work out, your lawyer will guide you better.
Also a general question, why are you filing for divorce and not for annulment when itās under 1 year?
PFalse accusations war is a free for all.Tell him you put pocso & Iāll put a sexual assault case for the time you did so & so to me under the garb of work. Then we either go to trial & spend on lawyers or we settle up, both lawyer & settlement will be more expensive than what you owe me.
If heās really in a power position, he knows how certain sections protect women from getting locked up, whereas SA charges can potentially put a man in jail immediately.
If I were in your shoes, Iād have messed things up rather than asking for payment. Thrash his car, lock his social media if you still got access, harmless stuff like those.
