Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
SAny alimony or settlement is based on the economic status. When the question of alimony comes up then the income level is a valid question to reach a judgement. How is it abuse of process unless you want to lie about your income level ? Is a lawyer advising a client to lie about material facts ? If not then the affidavit is just a paper containing answers to questions whose truthful answers will lead to the same results.SWithdrawal of PF attracts TDS and is liable to tax as though it was income earned subject to some exceptions. In your case since TDS is sought to be deducted you are not part of the exception.
The company will suffer consequences for non deduction from the IT department but ultimately you will need to pay the tax which would generally be at a rate higher than the TDS. You will also be liable to pay the company the excess money received.
SAs a very wise lawyer told me once “Never set out to teach someone a lesson through litigation, you end up learning several lessons yourself”You were drunk and abusive and were ejected from the pub. You could potentially face a counter charge of public intoxication.
SCases including PILs need to be fought with facts not rhetoric. How many cases ? How much incidence per x population ? Where is the balance of probability?Empty rhetoric sounds good on social media but you need facts to fight a PIL and random newspaper articles or tweets won’t do.
SArbitration is a process in which an independent person makes an official decision that ends a legal disagreement without the need for it to be solved in court.He’s like a judge and his decision is binding and it’s like a court hearing though it’s more informal.
SIt’s not an “arbitrary tribunal” it’s an arbitration tribunal. Please correct the spelling.Sole arbitrator means the arbitration panel has only one member.
Without knowing any details what can anyone say ? What is the dispute? What is the agreement? What are the clauses for disputes etc
If you don’t show up the arbitrator will not hear your side and in the future may pass an award against you.
SIf you have agreed to a no refund clause in writing then claiming it will be difficult. It would depend on the exact clause though.Informed consent is for medical treatment not commercial transactions. Here also in the form you do sign that you have understood the process and side effects which have been explained to you and that you consent . You will need to prove that crucial information was withheld which will be very difficult because you won’t have any proof that a specific fact wasn’t disclosed since the explanation would be oral and it will be a matter of “he said, she said”
Finally comes the question of negligence and lack of adherence to accepted medical standards. Again super difficult to prove.
SWhat does the judgement of 2007 say if decision was in 2007, else when was the decision given ? When was the name transfer complete?SYou deliberately did something illegal. You’re paying the price.The clean hands doctrine is based on the maxim of equity which states that one “who comes into equity must come with clean hands.” This doctrine requires the court to deny equitable relief to a party who has violated good faith with respect to the subject of the claim.
